Although I rather doubt that the law professors’ letter had much to do with it, I’m pleased to learn that the Supreme Court has granted cert. in the Hamdan appeal.
Recent Bluessky Posts- This one is very cheerful too, although I've been in remission long enough to realistically hope to never need it. Certainly sounds better than what I went through to get here. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/202... June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Life-changing spray may combat my partial immunocompromise: universal respiratory vaccine may be available in 5-7 years. Likely early pandemic countermeasure...could protect against influenza, common cold viruses, RSV, and other respiratory threats. I want this. loriacarrinc.com/news/vaccine... June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Crime against humanity. Murder. Evil. There better be trials soon after the restoration/revolution/reformation/2nd reconstruction whatever we call it. June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Phillips Obrien says recent events show that the US military is in dire shape and the Iran war is so irretrievably lost that Trump is resorting to bribing Iran to reduce attacks. Hegseth + strategic idiocy + firing competent officers + graft = disaster. phillipspobrien.substack.com/p/midweek-up... June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- John Marshall doesn't get above the fold? June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
A modest proposal for assuring the rights of detainess in the war on terror. See Innocent Until Proven Guilty
Yes, PBSWatcher, there is obviously no middle ground whatsoever between holding people forever without charge and immediate release. That’s why our Constitution didn’t include a Judicial Branch. It would have been pointless. Your sparkling analysis is much appreciated.
We don’t release them unconditionally. We make them promise to come back for their trials. Surely all the innocent ones will return and those are ones we are worried about.
Now, you’re not to go all guilty on us for maybe having abused your exorbitant influence as a Professor of Law to tip the balance, are you?