October 09, 2004
2nd Presidential Debate, Reax Roundup
- Good Kerry-won poll numbers
- Hullabaloo sees America’s ex-husband
- Balkin explains why Bush’s reference to the Dred Scott case is incoherent
- Literary cautionary tale
- Criticism of Bush’s wooden performance
- Matthew Yglesias tries on tin foil hat for size. Brad DeLong eyes one too
- MaxSpeak says Bush is as angry as Howard Dean — but of course won’t get the same media treatment (running the anger clip 50 times a day for a week). First Draft says Somewhere, Howard Dean is laughing. Angry Bear sees an Angry Bush (takes one to know one?). Wolcott would like less yelling.
- Robert’s thoughts are less random than the NYT editorial board
Bonus item:
- Get mad and get even!
Posted by Michael : October 9, 2004 02:54 PM | Politics: US: 2004 Election | TechnoLinks
Slashdot
It!
"Literary cautionary tale"? The proper phrase is "instruction manual."
Posted by: Swopa at October 9, 2004 04:51 PMBush was even worst than the first debate; frit, 'fraid and frayed.
Can't get how anyone saw an improvement.
Posted by: tom at October 9, 2004 05:34 PMKerry is running out of luck. On October 4, CNSnews.com reported an exclusive story revealing that Iraqi intelligence documents, confiscated by US forces, “show numerous efforts by Saddam Hussein’s regime to work with some of the world’s most notorious terror organizations, including al Qaeda, to target Americans. They demonstrate that Saddam’s government possessed mustard gas and anthrax, both considered weapons of mass destruction, in the summer of 2000, during the period in which United Nations weapons inspectors were not present in Iraq. And the papers show that Iraq trained dozens of terrorists inside its borders.”
Posted by: winatallcost at October 12, 2004 06:38 PM