Soghoian's Law of Identity Theft Stupidity: Anyone who publishes their own private financial details in a public discussion of identity theft will eventually find that information used for fraud.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Federation starships. June 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Why does it feel that those of us who bang on about this are shouting into the wind? And why does anyone think Marco Rubio is in any way unsullied by his participation in the Trump administration? June 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Next stop, Sorcerer's Apprentice. June 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- This just made me go *wow*. June 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Florida does zero reciprocity. Said to be out of fear that hordes of lawyers from out of state would come semi-retire here and hang out their shingle and take work away from the local bar. June 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
There’s a detail mentioned in passing in these reports, which I’d like to know more about. It’s the comment by Clarkson that, “The bank cannot find out who did this because of the Data Protection Act and they cannot stop it from happening again.”
How does the Data Protection Act keep an investigation from happening? Is Clarkson wrong, or is that a law run amok?