Apparently, I'm not the only person on the planet oblivious to much of what goes on around him:
Found via Boing Boing.
And this reinforces how unreliable eyewitness evidence is.
Or maybe 75% of people don’t like other people. Sounds about right.
Change Blindness also parallels with the idea that people won’t read directions. I’ve seen many psychology experiments where two paragraphs of text simply repeat, in various ways, please simply write “I read the directions” at the bottom of the page. Then below the paragraphs was a question “do you approve of X: yes [ ] no ” I’d estimate around 75%, much like the change blindness findings, simply checked a box…
I wonder if the results are the same if the person behind the counter is a woman.
Orin Kerr wonders “if the results are the same if the person behind the counter is a woman.”
I don’t think it matters. Dan Simons was the keynote speaker at a conference I attended a few years ago and he showed a number of these experiments. I believe that they did use female experimenters as well.
I came away from the talk thinking as John Flood did above — if I’m ever on a jury again, I’m going to take “eyewitness” evidence with a very large grain of salt.
I wonder if the author of the study could be qualified as an expert in a criminal trial to talk about the unreliability of most witnesses….and show the video to the jury….
So people don’t notice change.
That’s the first lesson of history.
Does anyone read history anymore?
Well, is that a change?
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.