Looks like Orin may have to wait for that beer: I'm not going to the AALS after all, but instead am at home, felled by some horrible stomach bug.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Federation starships. June 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Why does it feel that those of us who bang on about this are shouting into the wind? And why does anyone think Marco Rubio is in any way unsullied by his participation in the Trump administration? June 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Next stop, Sorcerer's Apprentice. June 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- This just made me go *wow*. June 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Florida does zero reciprocity. Said to be out of fear that hordes of lawyers from out of state would come semi-retire here and hang out their shingle and take work away from the local bar. June 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
Sorry to hear about your stomach bug :-(. Unfortunately, it appears you have much worse problems in Florida right now.
If we believe Vanessa Blum’s January 3, 2008 report in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, “Gag order raises questions in Liberty City terror retrial”, then U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard has lost her mind.
According to the article, Judge Lenard has decreed a “sweeping gag order”, which extends not only to the one defendant who was acquitted in the first trial, but also to his lawyers, and to his wife. From the article:
‘Tugging strongly against the First Amendment’ seems to be an early contender for understatement of the year. I’d put this the class of utterly unconstitutional. Manifestly unconstitional.
The judge’s supposed “need to damp down media coverage” does not justify a prior restraint against the never-charged wife of a now-acquitted person.
Judge Lenard has obviously lost her mind. If she doesn’t agree to resign voluntarily, then I think she needs to be impeached: The articles of impeachment should charge the common misdemeanor of lunacy.