The Guardian reports that Ian MacDonald QC, one a relatively small number of British barristers allowed to represent suspected terror suspects before the UK Special Immigration Appeals Commission , has announced he will not longer take those cases following the House of Lords ruling that the detentions are illegal. The Guardian speculates that many, perhaps all, of the other barristers with similar status will follow suit, putting a real spanner in the works. Once again, the British lawyers are ahead of us.
-
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
-
Light rain
71°F
-
Fri

81/68
-
Sat

76/56
-
Sun

70/54
-
Light rain
71°F
-
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.
Unique Homepage Views:
Sitemeter count:
Feed 1
Feed 2
Recent Comments
- Just me: Is it really a private transaction when states like our own fair Florida require you to have auto insurance?...
- Vic: I don’t understand what it wants me to DO? Bail out the REST of faltering America like we did Chrysler?...
- Michael Froomkin: AFAIK, all the ones around here are fixed, well-signed, and thus to some extent avoidable; the...
- i-celebes: Great Commercials…!!!
- Just me: We already use them right here in S.Fla. The 878 and 874 have recently installed toll booths with no cash...

I don’t think this is productive. How on earth can you protest an illegal detention by refusing to represent the detainees?? Yea, I understand the whole principle of not participating in a corrupt system, but that’s like protesting the unavailability of cheap medical care by refusing to give bandages to people who are bleeding to death.
Reminds me of the Dutch Bulb Speculators.
Oh, bah! I meant to post that in the virtual property story.