The nice people from Voyeur Dorm are in the news again. Last time the question was whether a virtual business ran afoul of a local zoning ordinance prohibiting adult businesses providing entertainment 'to the public' (the 11th Circuit said it was not, since the public was not allowed to attend in person). This time twelve former Voyeur Dorm employees are suing the site's owner,
alleging that the daily regimen of semi-nude sunbathing, housekeeping, swimming, showering and chat-room correspondence in the fishbowl of the World Wide Web went well beyond the limited hours they were told they would have to work.
They seek compensation for uncollected overtime pay.
The Tampa company has fired back with a lawsuit of its own, alleging two of the women violated a ''noncompete'' agreement by taking their talents, training and trade secrets to a rival business called Voyeur Cam Friends.
Although cavorting in a dorm may sound like easy labor, the plaintiffs say nitpicky rules often stipulated how they slept (with one leg dangling outside the sheets), brushed their teeth or watched TV (topless, or while painting one's toenails).
Continue reading →