Category Archives: Internet

Lots of people are suggesting that the ever-increasing wave of spam may bring e-mail as utility to its knees. Others are saying that when something is threatened, it fights back.

Paul Vixie is a genuine Internet pioneer, and a (the?) DNS guru. He was behind one of the big — and somewhat controversial — projects to 'blackhole' ISPs whose equipment was used by spammers. But although those projects did block some spam — and also caused harm to innocent bystanders — they proved insufficient to stem the spam tide.

Yesterday, Vixie (on the Nanog mailing list) delivered a prophesy about where this is leading. It deserves to be taken seriously. It is not pretty. In Vixie's view, if blackholing fails, the next step is a whitelist Internet—at the service provider level.

… you'd better prepare for the inevitability of widespread filtering against your DSL/Cable blocks

[…]

DSL/Cable is a fine access product, it's better than a phone line & modem because it allows faster web surfing, movies/mp3/etc on demand, and soon VoIP. but no e-mail server anywhere can afford the risk of accepting e-mail or any other push-data from them. risk management, in this case, is going to come in the form of widespread e-mail rejection from all DSL/ Cable blocks. “talk to the hand.”

[Then, in response to an earlier poster's suggestion that the solution to spam is “better ways to identify the specific sources of the unwanted traffic, even if they change IP addresses”]

my informal survey says the bad guys are better at this stuff than we are,
and they're getting better every day, and we're not. the trend isn't good.

As a DSL user I find the idea that my email will be seen as 'high risk' to be very ominous.

Dream about an application, and someone is already building it!

Back in November I wrote,

It’s true that linkrot is a serious problem. It’s also true that archive.org is only a partial solution since it doesn’t get anything and some big content providers — like the Washington Post — block it.

Is the only solution to make (copyright busting?) offline copies of everything? If so, where’s the tool that will automate that for me, and — more importantly — index all that content on my drive, disk, or tape?

Maximillian Dornseif wrote in the comments section that,

I have build such a beast. Basically it snatches your browsers browsers history and downloads the pages you have visited. Its running on a server because my notebook hasn't enough harddisk space for such experiments. Searching in this Archive is possible although at the moment only via the command line.

I share that installation with a few friends and we are looking at it as an research project. We would love to make it available to others but on thee other hand we have no desire to to though evaluation of the restrictions based upon us by the various laws governing immaterial goods.

See http://blogs.23.nu/disLEXia/stories/1412/ and http://blogs.23.nu/c0re/stories/1928/

That project looked a little experimental for me…but now it seems that someone else is trying to make a commercial version of a web memory/personal history full text search tool, and he calls it Furl:

John Battelle's Searchblog, Grokking Furl: Storage, Search, And The Personalweb: Mike [Giles] started Furl about a year ago to solve a problem he – and a lot of us – had with bookmarks. Namely, bookmarking is a lame, half-assed, unsearchable, flat, linkrotten approach to recalling that which you've seen and care to recall on the web. Now, a lot of folks have made stabs at solving this particular problem, but Mike's got a lot of very cool features built into his beta, and more on the way.

And from my conversation with him, he's got one more thing that others might be missing: a clear sense of what Furl could do if it were part of a massively scaled platform like AOL, Yahoo, Google, or MSN. If I'm reading him right, he's smart enough to realize that what he's built will probably be a feature set on everyone of those platforms before the end of 2005, and he's also smart enough to know that by launching Furl, he's forced all of them to consider him as the person to watch in the space.

So what is it about Furl that made me write that past paragraph? After all, it's just a web page-saving application. Right? Well, yes and no. Furl does a good job of helping you manage your web browsing. It adds several features that others don' t have – full text search on your saved pages, for example. But Furl saves the entire web page you've “furled”, not just the URL, which prevents link rot, on the one hand, and creates what I'll call a “PersonalWeb,” on the other.

Now, having your own PersonalWeb is a very cool thing. Every page you care about is now saved forever, and is searchable. How I wish I had Furl while I was researching my book for the past year. This application was inconceivable before the cost of storage and bandwidth began to fall toward zero.

But wait…there's more. You can share your PersonalWeb with others. And Mike just added a recommendation engine, so you can see links the service thinks will be interesting to you, based on what you've already Furl'd. Now, let's play this out. Imagine Furl on, oh, Yahoo, for example. Or Google. You now have a massively scaled application where millions of people are creating their own personal versions of the web, and then sharing them with each other, driving massively statistically significant recommendations, and…some pretty damn useful metadata that can be fed into search engine algorithms, resulting in…yup, far better search (and…far better SFO (Search Find Obtain) opportunities).

Jim Moore prophesizes about Personal Television Networks:

This afternoon Dave Winer and I were talking and he told me about his coinage of the term “Personal Television Networks”—PTNs. What are they? Think: what the personal computer was to the mainframe computer, personal television networks are to the current behemoth networks.

Which immediately makes me think of Bruce Springsteen.

Meanwhile, as we rebuild/remodel our house we are installing wiring for cable/satellite TV points in various places. But we still can't decide if we actually want to buy a TV.

This is odd. When I point Firefox at MS-NBC, I get this:

Network Error
Unable to read URL from host msnbc.msn.com: Not in GZIP format

But if I try to visit the site with IE6, it comes up just fine.

And yes, I tried it several times.

Is this a Firefox problem, a very very unlikely coincidence, or is MS-NBC blocking a non-MS browser.

Update: I only have this problem on the win98se machine, not on the win XP machine, which suggests it's something local. But it's very odd.

Now this is seriously depressing: The Death Clock – When Am I Going To Die?. According to this admittedly crude measure, I have less than a billion seconds to go. Sounds like a lot? Well it's less than 30 years…

Then again, the Clock also thinks that just about every senior citizen I know is on borrowed time, so I think it's a tad pessimistic here.

So I'm listening to Dr. Condi Rice on NPR. Idly I call up the real video at c-span to see the video. It's 22 seconds behind the radio. I wonder how much of this is encoding delay, and how much is network delay and how much is load/cache time.

I'm very conscious that things often sound very different on radio than they look on TV. It was often said that Nixon won his debate with JFK if you heard it, but lost if you saw him looking shifty.

Here it's rather the reverse. Dr. Rice's voice quavers on the radio; she sounds very nervous. On the picture, she looks glamorous and composed.