Category Archives: Dan Froomkin

The AWOL Issue Is On the Agenda

My brother's White House Briefing column today reports that Questions About Bush's Guard Service have “become a mainstream issue.” If it wasn't before, it is after this column, and the Post's fairly tame article by Lois Romano (assisted by the notorious Ceci Connolly, traveling with Kerry—expect him to be Gore'd any day now!—and researchers Don Puhlman and Lucy Shackelford in Washington).

I think these five, count them five, Post staffers all left out one fairly central point: GW Bush could presumably clear up this entire controversy in one minute, simply by authorizing the full release of his military records—something every major party candidate who was a verteran has done for the last few decades. Every single one, except GW Bush.

Who of course has nothing to hide.

Incidentally, I'd also like to know who had access to the records over the years, in case any documents are, say, missing, or contain serial numbers suggesting they were inserted out of sequence, both of which are allegations that are floating around. I'm sure the Pentagon keeps that sort of access record.

Posted in Dan Froomkin, Politics: US | Comments Off on The AWOL Issue Is On the Agenda

My Brother Takes Your Questions–And Asks One

My brother is currently “Live Online” at washingtonpost.com if you want to ask him questions about the White House or the State of the Union speech.

[#INCLUDE metaphysical question about status at other times]

P.S. Dan also has a question for you:

I asked you in yesterday’s column to help me figure out what Vice President Cheney meant when he asked, rhetorically, if he was [a] “brown cloud.” I’m still working on it. Even a call to his press secretary didn’t clear things up. If you have any more ideas, e-mail froomkin@washingtonpost.com.

Posted in Dan Froomkin | Comments Off on My Brother Takes Your Questions–And Asks One

My Brother Wants to Hear From You

washingtonpost.com: White House Briefing. My brother writes,

The Sad Lot of the White House Correspondent

In a very long piece in this week's New Yorker (not available on the Web at all), Ken Auletta assesses the miserable state of relations between the Bush White House and the press. White House officials think of the press as just another special interest. Reporters feel they are treated with contempt. (See the fifth item in yesterday's White House Briefing and the second item in Howard Kurtz's Media Notes from yesterday's Washington Post.)

In a Q and A on newyorker.com today, Auletta says that the much-coveted position of White House correspondent just ain't what it used to be. “This is partly because the news organizations are less interested in government,” Auletta says. “It is partly because ambitious reporters are turned off by the stenographic aspects of the White House beat. And it is partly the result of having fewer standout journalistic 'stars' covering the White House.”

Your thoughts? I'd love to hear them.

Personally, I can't for the life of me see why white house beat reporters accept the 'stenographic' aspect of the job. It may serve the White House for them to be passive, but it serves no one else.

Take this story for example. Why haven't reporters been collecting the questions the White House won't answer? Or this story —how come we haven't seen a single story about what happened during what might have been an overnight shredding party?

Of course, what I'd really like to see is adoption of my Modest Proposal For Improving White House Press Conferences. But I'm not holding my breath.

Posted in Dan Froomkin, Politics: US | Comments Off on My Brother Wants to Hear From You

Dan Froomkin’s White House Briefing

My brother inaugurates his new online column today at washingtonpost.com, White House Briefing. Go visit! (As though he'll need the traffic….)

Update: In a case of a mechanistic metaphor running amok, Brad DeLong says that, “It is truly a wonderful world we live in, in which someone as smart and energetic as Dan Froomkin is functioning as my personal pre-processor for White House-related news…”

Posted in Dan Froomkin, Politics: US | 2 Comments