Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Lawsuit: Dissing Cheney Gets You Arrested

“It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once.”
— David Hume

I’ve lifted this whole post from Talk Left — something I rarely do — because it describes something that makes me so cross:

Steven Howards and his son were walking by a Dick Cheney event this summer in Beaver Creek, on their way to a piano lesson. Howards told Cheney he didn’t approve of his war policy. When Howards walked back from the lesson, passing the site again, he was arrested. Charges later were dropped.

Colorado First Amendment Lawyer David Lane (think Ward Churchill) sued the secret service agent today, for violating his First and Fourth Amendment rights. The full complaint is here (pdf).

[UPDATE: NYT story on the suit. Don’t miss the last line.]

TalkLeft’s summary of the factual allegations in the lawsuit are below. Newer readers are encouraged to visit this earlier post of mine, America Needs You, Harry Truman–which deals with what your are free to say in America, and really isn’t as funny as it used to be.

Continue reading

Posted in Civil Liberties | Comments Off on Lawsuit: Dissing Cheney Gets You Arrested

Great Cartoon by Stuart Carlson

Posted in Torture | Comments Off on Great Cartoon by Stuart Carlson

Is Predatorgate a Democratic October Ambush?

Those few of you who read the comments on this blog may have noted a small dust-up in the comments to Predatorgate Scandal Spreads. One of the GOP spin points asserted there by an assiduous commentator is the idea that the Democrats are (at least? more?) to blame for letting a known predator run loose because they knew all about the scandal and did nothing. This isn’t a reference to the Democratic member of the page committee being totally shut out of discussions then (and now!) but rather an unsourced and unsubstantiated allegation that some unnamed Democratic sympathizer must have known all the juicy details and sat on them until the time it might do the most good. Since in fact neither I nor almost anyone else knows the source of the info that finally brought Rep. Foley’s behavior into the open, this sort of calumny is hard to rebut, although to my ear it has an element of blaming the victim — since a victim had to the original source of the damning information.

Amazingly, however, we now have some information on the subject of who leaked what to whom when:

Papers Knew of Foley E-Mail but Did Not Publish Stories: Then, in June, the reports resurfaced on Capitol Hill, where a neighborhood resident struck up a conversation in a bar with someone who had provided the e-mail messages. He said he passed them on to several news outlets. The resident, who said he was not affiliated with either party and was motivated by concern for the teenager, would talk only on condition of anonymity.

No one acted on the information until last week, and even then, it was a Web site that first posted the exchange. It is not clear who maintains the Weblog, stopsexpredators.blogspot.com, which appears to be largely devoted to the Foley scandal.

ABC News had its first account several days later on its Web site.

Mr. Ross said he was surprised by how quickly the congressman’s office confirmed the authenticity of the e-mail messages, first when ABC reported them on Sept. 28, and again a day later when confronted with much more explicit exchanges.

Mr. Ross dismissed suggestions by some Republicans that the news was disseminated as part of a smear campaign against Mr. Foley.

“I hate to give up sources, but to the extent that I know the political parties of any of the people who helped us, it would be the same party,” Mr. Ross said, referring to Republicans.

So to the extent we know who pushed this into the media … it’s Republicans. I have no idea who is behind stopsexpredators.com, but I bet that none of the people accusing them of being Machiavellian Democrats sitting on the info for ages do either. (And since when did Democrats get so good at Machiavellian tactics anyway?)

Posted in Politics: The Party of Sleaze | 7 Comments

Come Join the Fun at ‘Unblinking’

I’m going to an interesting conference in November called Unblinking: New Perspectives on Visual Privacy in the 21st Century (you can see the prelminary abstract for my paper PETs in Public), and there’s room for a few more:

We have space for a very limited number of audience-participants (the speakers were selected some months ago, but this is an interactive format). If you are interested, please send an inquiry to Maryanne McCormick by 10 Oct: a short bio, description of your work/interests in visual privacy, and your availability on these dates, in plain text to:

Maryanne McCormick

best,

Deirdre Mulligan and Pamela Samuelson

==========================================================

Unblinking: New Perspectives on Visual Privacy in the 21st Century

A Cross-Disciplinary Symposium UC Berkeley, Nov 3-4, 2006 https://www.law.berkeley.edu/bclt/events/unblinking

Co-Chairs: Deirdre K. Mulligan (Law) Pam Samuelson (Law and The Information School) Ken Goldberg (Engineering)

Worldwide demand for security cameras has expanded greatly since 9/11/2001 and the London transport bombings. Over the same period, consumer demand for high resolution digital and cell-phone cameras has increased markedly. Video applications are being incorporated into learning, healthcare, family and work environments. Engineers are responding with new generations of highly sophisticated chips, lenses, robotic platforms, and systems.

In a rapidly evolving environment of unblinking eyes, technologically perfected recollections, and permanent visual records, what will it mean to have privacy? How will the introduction of unblinking eyes alter how we experience and behave in public and private spaces?

Privacy is a complex and often abstract topic: this symposium will address “visual privacy,” a subset of the much broader topic of data privacy, and bring together experts from a range of perspectives: art, law, engineering, public policy, psychology, architecture, urban planning, sociology, human rights and others.

Continue reading

Posted in Talks & Conferences | Comments Off on Come Join the Fun at ‘Unblinking’

Predatorgate: GOP Leaders Cover-Up Unravels

Predatorgate is a serious matter, and Glenn Greenwald is all over it: This needs to be investigated. Things look really bad for Hastert — the Washington Times is going to call for his resignation. And things look bad for NRCC Chairman Tom Reynolds too.

I wish I lived in a country in which this or even this was the biggest scandal of the week. (Not to mention the Torture bill.) But there it is. And there’s some karmic appropriateness that those who lived by the sex scandal should also die by it.

Posted in Politics: The Party of Sleaze | Comments Off on Predatorgate: GOP Leaders Cover-Up Unravels

No Fear

National Democrats are scared of making a fight against excesses against national security because they think that someone will call them weak. What they don't understand is that they look weak when they don't fight; and that Karl Rove is going to call them terrorist sympathizers anyways.

Enter Senatorial candidate John Tester. In a recent debate with incumbent Conrad Burns, there was this exchange:

Tester, who showed a fuller range of emotion in the course of the evening, probably found a sound bite moment in response to a Burns charge that he is “soft on terrorism.” Tester, Burns said, “doesn’t understand this enemy” and would weaken the Patriot Act. “Let me be clear,” Tester shot back sharply. “I don’t want to weaken the Patriot Act. I want to repeal it.”

The Burns people thought they had a great gaffe and ran with it, producing the classic candidate as horror-film monster advertisement with grainy pictures and scary music. It's pretty awful, but here it is:

Tester, to his credit, isn't backing down one inch and is airing this reply:

Obligatory sanity disclaimer: There are actually some pretty good things in the Patriot Act as well as some really bad things. On balance I'd rather not have it, but the best outcome would be surgery rather than euthanasia.

Posted in Politics: US: 2006 Election | 2 Comments