Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

Sedna Doesn’t Have a Moon

Posted on April 14, 2004 by Michael Froomkin

Sedna Mystery Deepens With Hubble Images Of Farthest Planetoid: Sedna's existence was announced on March 15. Its discoverer, Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif., was so convinced it had a satellite, that an artist's concept of Sedna released to the media included a hypothetical moon.

Brown's prediction was based on the fact, Sedna appears to have a very slow rotation that could best be explained by the gravitational tug of a companion object. Almost all other solitary bodies in the solar system complete a spin in a matter of hours.

“I'm completely baffled at the absence of a moon,” Brown said.

As you can see from this Hubble telescope photo, there is no sign of Sedna's moon at all. Nope. Can't see a thing.

Posted in Science/Medicine | Comments Off on Sedna Doesn’t Have a Moon

It Only Hurts When I Don’t Laugh, and I’m Not Laughing

Posted on April 14, 2004 by Michael Froomkin

Wonkette is less cynical than me. She can still joke about this stuff:

ROEMER: OK. I'm just confused. You see him on August 6th with the PDB.
TENET: No, I do not, sir. I'm not there.
ROEMER: OK. You're not — when do you see him in August?
TENET: I don't believe I do.
ROEMER: You don't see the president of the United States once in the month of August?
TENET: He's in Texas.

OK, we're starting to get a picture of just how bad the technological lag was at the intelligence agencies… Imagine poor Tenet, desperately wanting to tell the president about this threat to national security: But no! The president is in Texas! Texas! “I just wish I had a way to speak to someone without actually being present in the room… some device that might transmit sound or text over wires… maybe even through the air!

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath, Politics: US: GW Bush Scandals | Comments Off on It Only Hurts When I Don’t Laugh, and I’m Not Laughing

Schneier: National ID is Single Point of Failure for Security

Posted on April 14, 2004 by Michael Froomkin

Security Guru Bruce Schneier (who wrote the book that was my intro to serious crypto) argues in an op-ed that A National ID Card Wouldn't Make Us Safer primarily because the GIGO problem for the data we'd use to issue the card makes it near worthless as a security device. What's worse, he says, a national ID card becomes a single point of failure for security if people trust it.

I agree about the GIGO problem (everyone serious does too as far as I can tell). And I agree that the ID cards have about no value as an anti-terrorism tool, although that's where the political push is coming from (their real virtues if they exist, are elsewhere). And I've argued before that over-reliance could be a problem in other ways, but didn't make the single-point-of-failure argument. May have to add that to the list…

Posted in ID Cards and Identification | Comments Off on Schneier: National ID is Single Point of Failure for Security

Another Cover-Up

Posted on April 14, 2004 by Michael Froomkin

New roadside attraction's a cover-up. It seems someone complained about nude classical-style statuary at a garden center because the statutes were visible from the road:

… the statues weigh as much as 500 pounds each and are an ordeal to move. So owners Angie Langford and Pam Gregory came up with a different approach to customer service.

Nearly a dozen concrete statues are sporting crimson velvet two-piece sarongs.

I suppose this explains why people got so worked up about the Janet Jackson thing. No, actually, it doesn't explain it…it's just consistent with it.

Posted in Completely Different | Comments Off on Another Cover-Up

You Get Used to the Monsoons

Posted on April 14, 2004 by Michael Froomkin

A UM first year encounters a local meterological phenomenon:

I like the weather in Miami — it's usually sunny and warm — which is a distinct difference from anywhere else I've lived for nine months of the year. The problem? There's this particular tendency for it to monsoon, sometimes out of the clear blue, that lasts for thirty minutes and then totally clears up. It's perfectly tropical.

I think I prefer snow to this.

You do get used to it. And it usually ends before the end of the work day, which is convenient.

Posted in Miami | 1 Comment

Listening to Bush

Posted on April 13, 2004 by Michael Froomkin

Did I hear this wrong? If I heard right, at one point Bush says that he looks forward to the election because it will give him the chance to show the American people that he has a (secret? at least currently undefined…) plan to win the War on Terror.

UPDATE1: Here's the text of this part from the AP transcript: “I don't intend to lose my job. Because I'm going to tell the American people I have a plan to win the war on terror.”

Then a few minutes later, Bush notes that people sometimes ask if you can win the War on Terror, and says that of course it's not a war that has an end.

The two statements are of course completely consistent, but it's rare to have a politician speak so frankly about his plan to lie to the public.

I must have heard it wrong. Maybe the second one was that you can win? (Although in fact it is very very hard to win a 'war' against an 'ism'. It can be done — see e.g. 'Communism' — but it takes generations.)

Update2 I heard it wrong, although in context I also heard it right: “We are in a long war. The war on terror is not going to end immediately. This is a war against people who have no guilt in killing innocent people. That's what they're willing to do. They kill on a moment's notice, because they're trying to shake our will, they're trying to create fear, they're trying to affect people's behaviors. And we're simply not going to let them do that.

“And my fear, of course, is that this will go on for a while, and therefore, it's incumbent upon us to learn from lessons or mistakes, and leave behind a better foundation for presidents to deal with the threats we face. This is the war that other presidents will be facing as we head into the 21st century.

“One of the interesting things people ask me, now that we're asking questions, is, can you ever win the war on terror? Of course you can.”

So, the War on Terror will go on through multiple presidencies, but has an end somewhere.

One thing I know I heard right — no apologies, no suggestions that any mistakes were made. Colors nailed to mast.

To be updated as necessary once the transcript is fully online.

Posted in Politics: US | 2 Comments