A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- There was a student note in the Harvard Law review a few years ago which proposed chopping up the District of Columbia up into a very large number of states. Actually legally feasible compared to some other things people suggest. August 1, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- I read that note. It's clever but the solution to a terrible small-d democratic deficit is not to make it much worse, Cf. papers.ssrn.com/abstract=379... August 1, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- More states with tiny populations is not the way. And PR is politically complex, not a solid D state at all. August 1, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Will anyone ask the Governor if he thinks this merits a preemptive pardon? July 31, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- For our mega-survey on populist attitudes, we asked whether people would prefer a more multi-party system or a two-party system. The former blew the latter out of the water. Asked about specific reforms to get there, people are less sure. Also, Trump populists are the most fond of the status quo. July 31, 2026 Andy Craig
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 52 other subscribers
Author Archives: Michael Froomkin
Today’s Movie
Posted in Politics: US: 2004 Election
Comments Off on Today’s Movie
Bush Sinks to New Low
Who knew they could sink lower?
Forgive me, Prof. Heller, for quoting your entire post on the wonderful Yin blog, but this is just perfectly true:
The Yin Blog: How not to Win a War–During last week’s debate, Bush opined:
I don’t see how you can lead this country in a time of war, in a time of uncertainty, if you change your mind because of politics.
Bush’s target, of course, was Kerry’s alleged “flip-flops” on Iraq. But he might as well have been talking about himself, as this article from the Los Angeles Times indicates:
The Bush administration plans to delay major assaults on rebel-held cities in Iraq until after U.S. elections in November, say administration officials, mindful that large-scale military offensives could affect the U.S. presidential race.
Although American commanders in Iraq have been buoyed by recent successes in insurgent-held towns such as Samarra and Tall Afar, administration and Pentagon officials say they will not try to retake cities such as Fallouja and Ramadi — where the insurgents’ grip is strongest and U.S. military casualties could be the highest — until after Americans vote in what is likely to be an extremely close election.
“When this election’s over, you’ll see us move very vigorously,” said one senior administration official involved in strategic planning, speaking on condition of anonymity.
“Once you’re past the election, it changes the political ramifications” of a large-scale offensive, the official said. “We’re not on hold right now. We’re just not as aggressive.”
Any delay in pacifying Iraq’s most troublesome cities, however, could alter the dynamics of a different election — the one in January, when Iraqis are to elect members of a national assembly.
If there was ever any doubt that political expediency is Bush’s most sacred value, this should put those doubts to rest once and for all.
Update: DeLong goes ballistic on this one:
Think about what this means. Think hard. Think very hard.
The generals say we should move now. Moving now gives us the greatest chance of victory at the lowest likely cost. Moving later gives us a lesser chance of victory at a higher cost in terms of our soldiers’ lives. But moving later is helpful to the Bush-Cheney campaign.
Impeach George W. Bush. Impeach Richard Cheney. Impeach them now.
Posted in Politics: US: GW Bush Scandals
4 Comments
Moving Essay at Escapable Logic
I commend to you a moving essay by Britt Blaser at Escapable Logic.
I don't know if I agree that “At our nation's birth, most voters were smarter, tougher, better educated and more patriotic than you and me” — that's edging a little in the Straussian direction for my taste — but it's a fine, heartfelt essay about war, heroics, politics, and the next election nonetheless.
Posted in Politics: US: 2004 Election, Readings
1 Comment
New Abu Ghraib Documents: “abuse far worse than what was originally reported”
Phil Carter reports that:
The Center for Public Integrity has obtained a series of previously classified documents from Rolling Stone writer Osha Gray Davidson surrounding the abuse investigations at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. Most of the documents are appendices to the various investigative reports that have been done, such as sworn statements from BG Janis Karpinski's aide-de-camp and a high-ranking JAG officer at the prison, as well as an Army CID report documenting some of the worst abuses there. Together, these reports paint a picture of abuse far worse than what was originally reported.
(emphasis added)
I'm not sure I can bear to look.
Posted in Iraq Atrocities
8 Comments
Brad DeLong Presents…Last Week in Shrillblog
Brad DeLong summarizes the first week in October over at the Shrillblog.
It's not pretty, all that shrillness in one place. What happens if it escapes?
Posted in Politics: US: 2004 Election
2 Comments
GMail is Not Working Tonight
GMail has been down for the past two hours. Occasionally I can get an email list, once in a while an email from the inbox, but never any that I've filed in a folder.
UM still can't provide me with reliable mail service…the email server went down last week for a while and no one knows why. I fear I will have to roll my own on the server that runs the blog. Do I wait for Dreamhost to finish beta-testing spamassasin? Install and configure my own? I have better things to do, darn it.
Posted in Internet
9 Comments