Discourse.net
On the fringes of the public sphere
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Introduction
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact
  • My Publications
  • Archives
← Must be Reform
She Does it Again →

IRL (R-27) Says No

Posted on March 14, 2017 by Michael Froomkin

Ros-Lehtinen Announces Her Intention To Vote No On AHCA Bill As Written

Related

This entry was posted in Health Care. Bookmark the permalink.
← Must be Reform
She Does it Again →
  • A Personal Blog
    by Michael Froomkin
    Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
    University of Miami School of Law
    My Publications | e-mail

    All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
  • Who Reads Discourse.net?

    Readers describe themselves.
    Please join in.
  • Reader Map

  • RSS Recent Bluessky Posts

    • Jotwell Corporate: Andrew F. Tuch, Private Equity, Retail Investors, and Litigation Risk, JOTWELL (May 20, 2026) (reviewing Ludovic Phalippou & William J. Magnuson, Private Equity, Public Capital, and Litigation Risk, available at SSRN (Nov. 14, 2025)), corp.jotwell.com/private-equi.... May 20, 2026 Jotwell
    • Trump has figured out the secret to getting away with astounding criminality: In modern politics it's not the crime that gets you, it's the cover-up. Other than the #epstein files, MAGA doesn't do cover-ups; all the financial thieving is loud and proud. May 20, 2026 Michael Froomkin
    • Any DOJ settlement that gives the President a dollar -- or a direct material benefit -- is a plain-as-day violation of the Presidential Emoluments Clause: "The President shall not receive ... any other Emolument from the United States, or any of [the states]." Art II, S.1, cl. 7. May 20, 2026 Jed H. Shugerman
    • It cannot bind, because you cannot rely to your detriment on a promise you make to yourself. The document itself is an unconstitutional violation of the presidential oath. May 19, 2026 James Grimmelmann
    • Historian here this is literally about gutting the Reconstruction amendments especially the consequential 14th amendment piece by piece. May 19, 2026 Manisha Sinha
  • Recent Comments

    • KK Ho on Introduction
    • Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
    • Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
    • Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
    • Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 51 other subscribers
  • Categories

  • Listening

    Froomkin's Pandora Quickmix
  • Follow

    • Subscribe via RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • Twitter
  • Creative Commons License
    © 2003-2024 A. Michael Froomkin. Unless otherwise stated, or copyright by others is indicated, textual content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States license. This permits non-profit reproduction so long as credit is given to the author and any resulting work is shared under the same or similar license. Links are appreciated. Library photo in header © 2008 Alex Nikada.
  • RSS Jotwell

    • Sex and Tech May 21, 2026 Aya Gruber
    • Private Equity, Retail Investors, and Litigation Risk May 20, 2026 Andrew F. Tuch
    • Ordinary Contract Law May 19, 2026 Orit Gan
    • Resilience and Judicial Power in the Aftermath of Trump v. CASA May 18, 2026 Suzette M. Malveaux
    • Putting a Human Face on Administrative Law May 15, 2026 Emily Hammond
    • Corporate Groups & the Principle of Reality May 14, 2026 Verity Winship
  • RSS Blenderlaw

    • eu commissioner didier reynders to visit miamilaw february 23, 2023 February 8, 2023
    • a ukrainian student at miami law in her own words June 3, 2022
    • canefunder for ukrainian students April 15, 2022
    • george bermann on international arbitration and eu law February 25, 2022
    • peter lederer August 10, 2021
    • comments on carbon border tax proposals July 30, 2021
Discourse.net