Lots of food for thought in Deven Desai’s Autonomous Vehicles: Unintended Upsides and Changes. In just a few paragraphs he suggests that self-driving cars could change policing, insurance, local government revenue and even parenting.
Recent Bluessky Posts- Jotwell Property: P. T. Babie, Architecture Reveals Property’s Power, JOTWELL (September 16, 2026) (reviewing Andrew Leach & Jasper Ludewig, Back to the Land, 28 Wolkenkuckucksheim: Int'l J. Architectural Theory 37 (2024/2025)), property.jotwell.com/architecture.... September 16, 2026 Jotwell
- They have a lot of money flowing in, and he needs to wet his beak. Maybe often. September 15, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Legislation: Anita Krishnakumar, Ambiguity and Judicial Power on the Roberts Court, JOTWELL (September 15, 2026) (reviewing Abbe R. Gluck, The End of Ambiguity (in Statutory Interpretation), 76 Duke L.J. __ (forthcoming 2026)(available at SSRN)), lex.jotwell.com/ambiguity-an.... September 15, 2026 Jotwell
- Year after year, everyone I send campaign contributions to loses. Should I change tactics and donate to Republicans? September 14, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Legal Hist: William Smiley, War, Empire, and Authoritarianism in the Middle East, JOTWELL (September 14, 2026) (reviewing Mustafa Aksakal, The War That Made the Middle East: World War I and the End of the Ottoman Empire (2026)), legalhist.jotwell.com/war-empire-a.... September 14, 2026 Jotwell
The article is a little short-sighted as there are other more obvious trade-offs that aren’t discussed.
For example, many of the benefits identified in the article (“reduced traffic accidents, fewer drunk drivers, more mobility for the elderly and the young”) apply to mass transit equally well. The difference being, mass transit is a technology that exists now, whereas autonomous vehicles will need to be developed at great costs for little marginal utility. Compared to the carriage, an automobile adds a lot of utility; compared to an automobile, an autonomous automobile has relatively little additional to contribute.
Additionally, there is a current cost in place for individualized transport that is not adequately addressed. For the current federal interstate system to be financially solvent — much less expanded or improved — the federal gasoline tax would need to be raised some 40¢ a gallon — now. The federal gas tax is NOT indexed to inflation, and was last raised by a nickel in 1993. Roads — and therefore driving — is heavily subsidized.
Which is to say, when the author says “Cities, counties, and states will have to find new ways to make up that revenue stream” this is not a new problem. Roads already don’t pay for themselves, and municipalities already make up the difference with property taxes and the like. Along these lines, I would argue that hybrid electric vehicles are greater revenue stream problem, since users of those vehicles pay even less for the roads they use, which are already heavily subsidized.
Lastly, there is the matter of energy efficiency. A city bus with just 6 passengers is getting 26 passenger miles per gallon. That’s pretty efficient, and it will be hard even for hybrids to compete with that, balanced over time.