Lots of food for thought in Deven Desai’s Autonomous Vehicles: Unintended Upsides and Changes. In just a few paragraphs he suggests that self-driving cars could change policing, insurance, local government revenue and even parenting.
Recent Bluessky Posts- Had one been elected promising national health that would have been strong evidence of a winning coalition for it. That sort of thing becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy sometimes. Electoral campaigns are not the moment to discuss the nuts and bolts of horse-trading. They're the time to inspire. April 29, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Emma Cave, Keeping Pace with Technological Advances, JOTWELL (April 29, 2026) (reviewing Neera Bhatia, Technology, Health, and Law in Life and Death Before the Cradle to Beyond the Grave (2025)), health.jotwell.com/keeping-pace.... April 29, 2026 Jotwell
- Seems to me there ought to be a problem if large numbers of women whose married names didn't match their birth names will need to get a passport in order to vote, and that passport will come with a partisan portrait. www.thebulwark.com/p/exclusive-... April 29, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Sad to learn that Barney Frank has entered hospice. Unfortunate he turned against the party's left, his natural allies, later in his career. April 29, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- If anything this post understates the case for the transparent idiocy of the new Comey indictment. I really wonder what the people who signed it think they are doing, and how they got that way. I sure hope I never see any former law student of mine in such a position. April 28, 2026 Michael Froomkin
The article is a little short-sighted as there are other more obvious trade-offs that aren’t discussed.
For example, many of the benefits identified in the article (“reduced traffic accidents, fewer drunk drivers, more mobility for the elderly and the young”) apply to mass transit equally well. The difference being, mass transit is a technology that exists now, whereas autonomous vehicles will need to be developed at great costs for little marginal utility. Compared to the carriage, an automobile adds a lot of utility; compared to an automobile, an autonomous automobile has relatively little additional to contribute.
Additionally, there is a current cost in place for individualized transport that is not adequately addressed. For the current federal interstate system to be financially solvent — much less expanded or improved — the federal gasoline tax would need to be raised some 40¢ a gallon — now. The federal gas tax is NOT indexed to inflation, and was last raised by a nickel in 1993. Roads — and therefore driving — is heavily subsidized.
Which is to say, when the author says “Cities, counties, and states will have to find new ways to make up that revenue stream” this is not a new problem. Roads already don’t pay for themselves, and municipalities already make up the difference with property taxes and the like. Along these lines, I would argue that hybrid electric vehicles are greater revenue stream problem, since users of those vehicles pay even less for the roads they use, which are already heavily subsidized.
Lastly, there is the matter of energy efficiency. A city bus with just 6 passengers is getting 26 passenger miles per gallon. That’s pretty efficient, and it will be hard even for hybrids to compete with that, balanced over time.