Looks like we'll be doing some Vosberg v. Putney today.
Recent Bluessky Posts- youtu.be/U3Zh4JH-qEc?... December 30, 2025 Michael Froomkin
- So far only in mice. But maybe a certain President could get advanced access to the human trials? December 30, 2025 Michael Froomkin
- Trump's shifting accounts of the Epstein files sounds seriously insane when summarized. Wonder why that is? December 30, 2025 Michael Froomkin
- Sorry... why would there need to be an emergency indoor inauguration on January 20, 2029 with bulletproof glass and protections against civilian monitoring tech? Oh, that's right. Martial law is coming. I keep forgetting. December 30, 2025 Seth Abramson
- How I wish we'd had this for my grandmother. December 29, 2025 Michael Froomkin
Sounds a lot like you’re teaching Elements, Michael!
Seriously, I applaud the “long, hard slog” through a classic case as an introduction to a first-year course. For many years, I would spend the first two-to-three sessions of Contracts on Hurley v. Eddingfield. And when cranky senior colleagues began complaining about my “lack of coverage” — and pressing those complaints during the tenure process — I responded in the only way I know: by devoting an additional week to Hurley. Enjoy!