NYT does the Dan Froomkin story — although their focus is on the issue of when/whether newspapers and other media should let traffic/popularity determine what stays and what goes.
Recent Bluessky Posts- "Papers please". Putin would be so proud. Good to see that the victim had no truck with it despite the threats. January 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Legal Hist: Samy Ayoub, Equality Before Law: Just Zionism, Political Liberalism, and the Question of Palestine, JOTWELL (January 12, 2026), legalhist.jotwell.com/equality-bef.... 1/2 January 12, 2026 Jotwell
- Winning hearts and minds, right? January 12, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- We have cleaned up the crime scene and blocked a local investigation and hidden the perpetrator and invaded the state and that is how you know that we are acting in good faith and that everything was the victim’s fault. www.nytimes.com/live/2026/01... January 11, 2026 Timothy Snyder
- More evidence that the sleeping beast is waking. Might even get woke... January 11, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Which, of course, is a derivative issue to the real story, and hardly worth mentioning in the same space.
Thanks for reducing the issue about what happened to Dan to “should popularity force editors’ hands in content decisions”, NYT. Like it is about Paris Hilton coverage or something. Popularity.
Because we surely wouldn’t want the hard-working NYT editors to have their decisions dictated to them, they are clearly so good at making these decisions by themselves.
Of course, we should not expect to ever see the term “accountability journalism” in the NYT, because that would just make a (further) mockery of the organization.
I wonder why NYT is so darn unpopular that it loses money? Good riddance, NYT, and don’t let the door…