NYT does the Dan Froomkin story — although their focus is on the issue of when/whether newspapers and other media should let traffic/popularity determine what stays and what goes.
Recent Bluessky Posts- People focus on the ABA's friendliness to DEI, but a much more consequential thing has been its demand for more clinical and experiential learning. This is commonly a right-wing demand (less theory! more skills!) so we'll see if this move changes anything in that respect. Might make it greater... January 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- This headline was a mild surprise. I had not contemplated that the thoroughly corrupt FIFA leadership had any capacity for shame. I suspect they just didn't like the bad PR of being so tightly associated with Trump. www.theguardian.com/football/202... January 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- "Never waste a crisis." January 17, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Would they consider Florida instead? January 17, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Reads like the news from Iran, doesn't it? January 17, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Which, of course, is a derivative issue to the real story, and hardly worth mentioning in the same space.
Thanks for reducing the issue about what happened to Dan to “should popularity force editors’ hands in content decisions”, NYT. Like it is about Paris Hilton coverage or something. Popularity.
Because we surely wouldn’t want the hard-working NYT editors to have their decisions dictated to them, they are clearly so good at making these decisions by themselves.
Of course, we should not expect to ever see the term “accountability journalism” in the NYT, because that would just make a (further) mockery of the organization.
I wonder why NYT is so darn unpopular that it loses money? Good riddance, NYT, and don’t let the door…