This new anti-McCain video, THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF TEST from Humanitainment.com feels a little too harsh to be effective. That's a shame in a way, since the clips are very damning. But to my eye the overlays somehow trivialize them and reduce their sting.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- @miamilawschool.bsky.social admitted its best-credentialed and most selective 1L class ever. The MiamiLaw admit rate is vastly lower than when I started here, and the LSATs much higher. (Hard to evaluate higher GPAs in light of grade inflation.) Doing something right news.miami.edu/law/stories/... August 19, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Amazed it wasn't yesterday too. August 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- I think that was the Moderns, right? (As opposed to the Ancients, or the Middle-English....) August 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- I'm guessing this isn't aimed at law school faculty? It seems to assume undergraduate teaching.... August 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Still on 6. Nervously eyeing the coming end of security patches in October. August 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers
I agree that this video is ineffective, at least for most of America. Videos like this one are simply designed to whip the extremist outer fringes into action, and at that it may be effective.
:O)
George
I’m not sure it is too harsh. It may be that a little harshness is necessary.
Oh, and is it just too geeky to note that supporting (in theory at least) solar system exploration doesn’t seem to fit with the rest of these poor judgments. It’s worth arguing about how much we should spend on manned space exploration, but being pro-Mars doesn’t to me seem to be a disqualification from office.
I’m not sure it is too harsh. It may be that a little harshness is necessary.
Oh, and is it just too geeky to note that supporting (in theory at least) solar system exploration doesn’t seem to fit with the rest of these poor judgments. It’s worth arguing about how much we should spend on manned space exploration, but being pro-Mars doesn’t to me seem to be a disqualification from office.