This new anti-McCain video, THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF TEST from Humanitainment.com feels a little too harsh to be effective. That's a shame in a way, since the clips are very damning. But to my eye the overlays somehow trivialize them and reduce their sting.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- I have found Matthew Sag on #AI to be always worth reading and this is no exception. (I haven't always agreed, but where is the fun in that?) September 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Oh boy yes. September 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Gift link to NYT article: www.nytimes.com/2026/09/10/a... September 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- If you had told me even 18 months ago that the government would directly censor a broadcast comedian for interviewing an opposition politician, I would have said, "Sure, in Russia." But when you said "No, in the USA," I would have been deeply dubious. We're drowning in the deep end, folks. September 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell IP: Michael W. Carroll, Distinguishing the Historical Roots of Goodwill From Trademark Law’s Origins, JOTWELL (September 10, 2026) (reviewing Barbara Lauriat, Borrowing Goodwill, 67 Boston College L. Rev. 1127 (2026)), ip.jotwell.com/distinguishi.... September 10, 2026 Jotwell
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers
I agree that this video is ineffective, at least for most of America. Videos like this one are simply designed to whip the extremist outer fringes into action, and at that it may be effective.
:O)
George
I’m not sure it is too harsh. It may be that a little harshness is necessary.
Oh, and is it just too geeky to note that supporting (in theory at least) solar system exploration doesn’t seem to fit with the rest of these poor judgments. It’s worth arguing about how much we should spend on manned space exploration, but being pro-Mars doesn’t to me seem to be a disqualification from office.
I’m not sure it is too harsh. It may be that a little harshness is necessary.
Oh, and is it just too geeky to note that supporting (in theory at least) solar system exploration doesn’t seem to fit with the rest of these poor judgments. It’s worth arguing about how much we should spend on manned space exploration, but being pro-Mars doesn’t to me seem to be a disqualification from office.