Monthly Archives: January 2008

Presidential Elections 101

I gave a talk today to a very charming group of visiting journalists from all over Europe who were invited by the US State Department to observe the US primary election process. And they're starting here in Miami.

I promised I would post a link to my slide presentation. Because I wasn't sure that all of our visitors were necessarily traveling with powerpoint, as an experiment I've converted the file to a flash presentation. Please let me know if this doesn't work for you.

Cross-cultural conversations always reveal surprising assumptions. My biggest surprise was when, after I'd explained how we register to vote, someone asked whether party preferences were a public record or were covered by privacy law. I said this wasn't private — and half the room looked startled and shocked. It seems that in many European countries, where primaries are rare to non-existent and thus there is no need to make party affiliation public, the very idea that one might be forced to disclose it feels like an assault on the secret ballot.

Questioners also asked about the danger of retaliation: can you be fired for belonging to the wrong party? Since party affiliation isn't a protected class statutorily or constitutionally, I had to say that in private employment you could be fired for being a Democrat, a Republican or whatever. (Of course in public employment there are a number of statutory and constitutional protections that, other than in top policy making jobs, tend to protect civil servants.) But, I explained, I thought that such cases were very rare. This clearly didn't go over as very convincing.

Posted in Talks & Conferences | 1 Comment

Take the Train

It seems that if you take the train you might hear stuff: Open Left:: An Interesting Train Ride.

One interesting aspect of this story is that it probably never occurred to the main protagonist, a paleoconservative former US Senator, that any of the regular folks hearing him would have access to the sort of megaphone that blogging can give you.

And after all, if they were DC journalists, odds are good that they're housebroken and would never write about it without permission.

Posted in Politics: US: 2008 Elections | 1 Comment

NYC Proposes to Ban Unlicensed Environmental Monitors

Here's news from the Village Voice about a proposed NY city ordinance which, I suspect, is not unconstitutional — it's just monumentally stupid.

NYPD Seeks an Air Monitor Crackdown for New Yorkers:

Richard Falkenrath, the NYPD's deputy commissioner for counterterrorism …. and Mayor Michael Bloomberg have asked the City Council to pass a law requiring anyone who wants to own [machines that detect traces of biological, chemical, and radiological weapons] to get a permit from the police first. And it's not just devices to detect weaponized anthrax that they want the power to control, but those that detect everything from industrial pollutants to asbestos in shoddy apartments. Want to test for pollution in low-income neighborhoods with high rates of childhood asthma? Gotta ask the cops for permission. Why? So you “will not lead to excessive false alarms and unwarranted anxiety,” the first draft of the law states.

Note that there is no actual evidence to date of police resources being wasted on such false alarms. They're just planning ahead.

It may not be irrelevant that when the Environmental Protection Agency pronounced the air surrounding Ground Zero as safe, independent testers proved this to be a lie. The proposal would presumably shield the tender psyche of New Yorkers from being confronted with such discomforting truths.

There is a case to be made for thinking about the profusion and deployment of sensors, not least cameras, in our cities. Some rules about how personally-identifiable data can be stored and shared might be a good idea (although there are first amendment constraints).

But this proposal is just wrongheaded at best and the product of a deeply statist mind at worst. And Bloomberg thinks he wants to be President?

Update: Here's some news from Purdue via Slashdot that ought to make Bloomberg's and Falkenrath's heads explode — Cell Phone Radiation Detectors Proposed to Protect Against Nukes,

… researchers are developing a radiation detection system that would rely on sensors within cell phones to locate and track potentially hazardous material. From the Purdue news service: “Such a system could blanket the nation with millions of cell phones equipped with radiation sensors able to detect even light residues of radioactive material. Because cell phones already contain global positioning locators, the network of phones would serve as a tracking system, said physics professor Ephraim Fischbach. 'The sensors don't really perform the detection task individually,' Fischbach said. 'The collective action of the sensors, combined with the software analysis, detects the source. Say a car is transporting radioactive material for a bomb, and that car is driving down Meridian Street in Indianapolis or Fifth Avenue in New York. As the car passes people, their cell phones individually would send signals to a command center, allowing authorities to track the source.'”

Posted in Civil Liberties | Comments Off on NYC Proposes to Ban Unlicensed Environmental Monitors

Geek Art(ifacts)

Via Eszter's Blog, a link to the wonderful and funny Understanding art for geeks – a photoset on Flickr.

You need to know some HTML and spend too much time online to get all the jokes, but even without many will be funny. Half a dozen made me laugh out loud and most made me smile. (Warning: One or two were in bad taste.)

Here's a sample, a Wikipediaficiation of Cristiano Banti's, Galileo facing the Roman Inquisition (1857):

Posted in Kultcha | 1 Comment

Why Republicans Will Lose The Presidency In 2008

YouTube – Why Republicans Will Lose The Presidency In 2008

Well, that and the economy.

Posted in Iraq, Politics: US: 2008 Elections | 2 Comments

Nobody’s Safe

Well, for now, nobody poor is safe. But give them time.

McClatchy, Immigration officials detaining, deporting American citizens:

Thomas Warziniack was born in Minnesota and grew up in Georgia, but immigration authorities pronounced him an illegal immigrant from Russia.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement has held Warziniack for weeks in an Arizona detention facility with the aim of deporting him to a country he's never seen. His jailers shrugged off Warziniack's claims that he was an American citizen, even though they could have retrieved his Minnesota birth certificate in minutes and even though a Colorado court had concluded that he was a U.S. citizen a year before it shipped him to Arizona.

On Thursday, Warziniack was told he would be released. Immigration authorities were finally able to verify his citizenship.

“The immigration agents told me they never make mistakes,” Warziniack said in a phone interview from jail.

It's really worth reading the whole article: no right to a lawyer, no help getting documents, no one believes the documents you get or the witnesses you find, and you have the burden of proof of showing you are a citizen — while in custody.

(spotted via Emergent Chaos, “We have to be careful we don't release the wrong person”)

Posted in Civil Liberties, Law: Everything Else | 5 Comments