Digby has much more information about the US and Iran than I found in my newspaper.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- youtu.be/U3Zh4JH-qEc?... December 30, 2025 Michael Froomkin
- So far only in mice. But maybe a certain President could get advanced access to the human trials? December 30, 2025 Michael Froomkin
- Trump's shifting accounts of the Epstein files sounds seriously insane when summarized. Wonder why that is? December 30, 2025 Michael Froomkin
- Sorry... why would there need to be an emergency indoor inauguration on January 20, 2029 with bulletproof glass and protections against civilian monitoring tech? Oh, that's right. Martial law is coming. I keep forgetting. December 30, 2025 Seth Abramson
- How I wish we'd had this for my grandmother. December 29, 2025 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Jennifer Cummings on Are Coral Gables Police Cooperating with ICE?
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
Did you see this?
The Pentagon has been using a little-known power to obtain banking and credit records of hundreds of Americans and others suspected of terrorism or espionage inside the United States, part of an aggressive expansion by the military into domestic intelligence gathering.
I know Digby has a consumate following among many liberals, but I have to say, I get awfully tired of the constant sexist digs that pepper so many Digby posts. This was a small one (compared to crap like this in which Digby endorses two books that James Dobson’s Focus on the Family follwers also have a fondness for, as they “prove” women can’t be leaders) but really, was it necessary to the point for Digby to say “I honestly don’t know what purpose Suzanne Malveaux’s report served except to have a pretty face deliver the white house spin“? Blech.