There is a rather major disconnect between, on the one hand this this insipid New York Times account of the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner and this almost as pointless account in the Washington Post, and on the other hand, Peter Daou’s take which left in the venom. Truth or truthiness? See the video and you be the judge. (The video is in three parts; the third IMHO is sort of a waste of time.)
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Yes he was much worse in other famous cases. August 25, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Yes indeed Miami is a lizard wonderland. (And this story has a guide with photos.) Could it explain out politics? www.miamiherald.com/news/local/e... August 25, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Actually Cardozo very frequently misstated precedent to make it look like what he was doing was less avulsive. That's why Posner loved him... August 25, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Common law has scope for judicial invention. So too equity, even federal, although like cases (however defined) demand like treatment. And I believe elected state court judges have some extra legitimacy for creativity more generally. None of which justifies what the Six are doing. August 25, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Amidst all the darkness, a small piece of good news courtesy of Judge Vargas of the SDNY. www.nytimes.com/2026/08/21/u... August 24, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers
I just watched the Colbert video and agree, the “demo tape” bit was overwrought and stooopid. It detracted from the rest of the message.
Colbert’s delivery was a bit choppy but I guess it’s difficult to stay completely composed while flaying a man to little pieces when he’s sitting six feet way from you on the dais (not to mention the rest of the supine press corps in the same room). In general I don’t find Colbert all that amusing — the faux O’Reilly act only goes so far before it becomes as annoying as the original.
Overwrought, yes. stupid ? Not by a long shot.
The demo tape had two parts:
The conference that used splices of actual gaggle footage to demonstrate how sheep-like the White House Press Corp acts in the face of the utter contempt and condescension shown them by the Bush administration.
And the closer, which was intentionally overwrought. It spoofs the hollywood (horror/action thriller) conventions for creating audience tension by stretching them out beyond the point of credibility. Working a garage (a la Deep Throat) into the segment is only one more dig at the Press.
The Message to the Press was “why are you so afraid when these people are so scared of granny Helen Thomas? Is she the only one with cojones in the WH Press Corps ?”
I agree. You should also see the articles like this at this site: http://www.saneworks.us.
Revising and extending my remarks, I’ll have to say that I largely agree with Patrick(G)‘s comment. The first part of the “demo reel” was fairly well done but the second half still spiraled into the toidy for me.
I got the point. I just didn’t think it was all that well delivered.