Marty Lederman deconstructs what he calls — with positively British understatement — a rather remarkable and unusual event: “the Chair of a congressional intelligence committee asserts that the landmark framework statute over which his committee has jurisdiction is unconstitutional.”
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Comments
- Dan Froomkin on The Case of the Capitol Police and the January 6 Near-Putsch
- Just me on The Case of the Capitol Police and the January 6 Near-Putsch
- C.E. Petit on Read it and Prepare to Weep
- Michael Froomkin on Restoring Multi-Row Tabs in FF 107
- Dan Riley on Coalition Government in the US House — It’s Not an Analogy, It’s a Strategy
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 2,781 other subscribers
In what I’m sure is purely a coincidence, everybody where I work was ordered today to complete Intelligence Oversight training again immediately, even if we weren’t due annual training for months. (And it was unchanged from every previous year.)