Marty Lederman deconstructs what he calls — with positively British understatement — a rather remarkable and unusual event: “the Chair of a congressional intelligence committee asserts that the landmark framework statute over which his committee has jurisdiction is unconstitutional.”
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- I'm didn't think that's exactly what Andres likely said..... April 1, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- And consent? March 31, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- I imagine that students are asked, at least optionally, as part of the application process. I would bet that patients in the medical system are asked, but I imagine that is covered by HIPAA. March 31, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Only if you would be prepared to justify it to an IRB. March 31, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- History shouts pretty loud that nothing good comes from this sort of thing. March 31, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
In what I’m sure is purely a coincidence, everybody where I work was ordered today to complete Intelligence Oversight training again immediately, even if we weren’t due annual training for months. (And it was unchanged from every previous year.)