Here's Ed Felton with a more elegant discussion of the verifiable voting problem I mentioned yesterday: see his Phonecams and the Secret Ballot.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- I'd write a reply, but it would take a thread made of hundreds of Bluesky posts. April 14, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Tax: Diane Ring, Showdown or Balancing Act: Reconciling Our Commitments to the Tax System and the Legal System, JOTWELL (April 14, 2026) (reviewing Siddesh Rao, Client-Attorney Privilege: The Last Barrier to Tax Transparency, 18 World Tax J. 1 (2026)), tax.jotwell.com/showdown-or-.... April 14, 2026 Jotwell
- Published a blog post about how I got my congressperson to convince SFO to change their illegal mandatory biometrics collection blog.yomna.net/opting-out-o... April 14, 2026 yomna
- I gather it might be several weeks before the Hungarian election is officially certified, and the Parliament can meet to elect a new Prime Minister. Plenty of time for mischief if the outgoing crew is so minded. April 13, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- I am very proud and excited to share that a special issue of the Canadian Journal of Law and Technology featuring We Robot 2025 conference papers is now published and fully open access, with thanks to funding support from @windsorlaw.bsky.social: digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cjlt/vol23/i... April 13, 2026 Kristen Thomasen
Recent Comments
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
Not so fast. In fact, the screen that shows you the options, and then the recap of your choices for the ballot, then gave you an option to go back and change any and every vote. There was no summary page shown you could photograph after the vote was irrevocable. So all you’d be able to prove was that you’d checked for Kerry, not that you didn’t uncheck later and swap votes. I say its still not provable to the point of seeking financial gain for the choice…