Here's Ed Felton with a more elegant discussion of the verifiable voting problem I mentioned yesterday: see his Phonecams and the Secret Ballot.
We Robot 2021: Sept 21-23
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Comments
- Vic on UMiami Confronts Legacy of Two Buildings (But Not a Street) Named After Racists
- Michael Froomkin on UMiami Confronts Legacy of Two Buildings (But Not a Street) Named After Racists
- Vic on UMiami Confronts Legacy of Two Buildings (But Not a Street) Named After Racists
- Eric on UMiami Confronts Legacy of Two Buildings (But Not a Street) Named After Racists
- Michael Froomkin on UMiami Confronts Legacy of Two Buildings (But Not a Street) Named After Racists
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Not so fast. In fact, the screen that shows you the options, and then the recap of your choices for the ballot, then gave you an option to go back and change any and every vote. There was no summary page shown you could photograph after the vote was irrevocable. So all you’d be able to prove was that you’d checked for Kerry, not that you didn’t uncheck later and swap votes. I say its still not provable to the point of seeking financial gain for the choice…