Here's Ed Felton with a more elegant discussion of the verifiable voting problem I mentioned yesterday: see his Phonecams and the Secret Ballot.
Recent Bluessky Posts- Jotwell Conlaw: Ilya Somin, Federalism, Originalism, and Immigration, JOTWELL (July 17, 2026) (reviewing Anna O. Law, Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants (2026)), conlaw.jotwell.com/federalism-o.... July 17, 2026 Jotwell
- One of the best books I ever read. July 16, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Much (but not all) of what I teach changes quickly, e.g. AI law and these days Adlaw. For the other stuff I change things around. So I'm not on the whole that concerned about outlines. Maybe I'm deluding myself... July 16, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Corporate: Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci, When Corporations Govern: Matteo Gatti’s Timely Framework for Understanding Corporate Power, JOTWELL (July 16, 2026) (reviewing Matteo Gatti, Corporate Power and the Politics of Change (2025)), corp.jotwell.com/when-corpora.... July 16, 2026 Jotwell
- Handwriting is a lost art in this age of keyboards. Plus what about dyslexic people like me who can't read their own writing? July 16, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Not so fast. In fact, the screen that shows you the options, and then the recap of your choices for the ballot, then gave you an option to go back and change any and every vote. There was no summary page shown you could photograph after the vote was irrevocable. So all you’d be able to prove was that you’d checked for Kerry, not that you didn’t uncheck later and swap votes. I say its still not provable to the point of seeking financial gain for the choice…