Here's Ed Felton with a more elegant discussion of the verifiable voting problem I mentioned yesterday: see his Phonecams and the Secret Ballot.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mailWho Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Comments
- Just me on Mandatory Unpaid Labor by Government Workers: Involuntary Servitude? Wages and Hours Violation?
- Plaintiff in first no-fly trial wins another appeal on attorneys’ fees and government lawyers’ bad faith | Papers, Please! on Did AG Eric Holder Commit Perjury? Whose Head Should Roll?
- Vic on You Guess
- Vic on My Brother Imagines a Hypothetical World in Which Republicans Answer Hypothetical Questions
- Vic on My Brother Imagines a Hypothetical World in Which Republicans Answer Hypothetical Questions
Not so fast. In fact, the screen that shows you the options, and then the recap of your choices for the ballot, then gave you an option to go back and change any and every vote. There was no summary page shown you could photograph after the vote was irrevocable. So all you’d be able to prove was that you’d checked for Kerry, not that you didn’t uncheck later and swap votes. I say its still not provable to the point of seeking financial gain for the choice…