Here's Ed Felton with a more elegant discussion of the verifiable voting problem I mentioned yesterday: see his Phonecams and the Secret Ballot.
Recent Bluessky Posts- Trump says he can spend $1.3 trillion without Congress. World will not land on him like a ton of bricks, proving again total suspension of disbelief in press and political leadership. www.cbsnews.com/texas/news/p... Or. as they say, I'm old enough to remember when we had a national legislature. September 11, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Jurisprudence: Andrew Halpin, Realism or Formalism or Both?, JOTWELL (September 11, 2026) (reviewing Andrew S. Gold & Thilo Kuntz, Bridges Between Realism and Formalism, 70 Am. J. Juris. 121 (2025)), juris.jotwell.com/realism-or-f.... September 11, 2026 Jotwell
- I have found Matthew Sag on #AI to be always worth reading and this is no exception. (I haven't always agreed, but where is the fun in that?) September 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Oh boy yes. September 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Gift link to NYT article: www.nytimes.com/2026/09/10/a... September 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Not so fast. In fact, the screen that shows you the options, and then the recap of your choices for the ballot, then gave you an option to go back and change any and every vote. There was no summary page shown you could photograph after the vote was irrevocable. So all you’d be able to prove was that you’d checked for Kerry, not that you didn’t uncheck later and swap votes. I say its still not provable to the point of seeking financial gain for the choice…