Something else with which to stoke your outrage — how the Bush/RNC slime machine is trying to suggest that anyone who suggests the Boy Emperor's Iraq campaign may be having a wardrobe malfunction is unpatriotic, or maybe even treasonous.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Someone needed to do this! Where is the titular leadership on this sort of thing? September 1, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Contracts: Robert Hillman, What is in a Label? The Problem of Imitation Agreements to Arbitrate, JOTWELL (September 1, 2026) (reviewing Myriam Gilles, Arbitration in Name Only, 121 Nw. L. Rev. __ (forthcoming 2026), available at SSRN), contracts.jotwell.com/what-is-in-a.... September 1, 2026 Jotwell
- Please can we now get Flock and other LPR tech out of cities like Coral Gables? When the Commission first decided to buy then I made a very rare appearance in the public comment to speak against. But cops said all the other cops were doing it, so City should too. Passed without further discussion. September 1, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Old enough to remember being taught that the alphabet was a huge civilization advance over pictograms. And to have it ratified by Civ III too. September 1, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Conlaw: Evan Bernick, How Originalism Makes Law, JOTWELL (August 31, 2026) (reviewing Alma Diamond, Lawfinding’s Dilemma: Legal Formalism, or Judicial Neutrality, 104 Or. L. Rev. 117 (2025)), conlaw.jotwell.com/how-original.... August 31, 2026 Jotwell
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers
There aren’t the words to describe how irresponsible this new turn of rhetoric is, and it is further evidence that either (1) the Republicans simply cannot appreciate the long-term consequences of their actions for the country they claim to love, or (2) they want power at any cost.
Conservatives take Bush as the gospel truth. It thus follows that if the Bush administration says the Democrats want the enemy to win, then aren’t the Democrats manifest traitors? The next step would be the bomb blasts from vigilantes at local Democratic party booths. And if Kerry is providing aid and comfort to the enemy, is he now an “enemy combatant”? Will Bush strip him of his rights and send him to Gitmo? As I read the link and the commentaries from conservative authors and politicians with an eye on the torture memos, it almost seems like the Bush administration is systematically building a case for removing Kerry. No…I don’t even want to go there. Or think about it.