I have no idea if the women I had lunch with today are representative of anything, but they were not part of the University and they thought that this ad was very effective and described it to me in some detail. Having now found it on the Internet, I'm surprised — it seems a little heavy-handed to me. But based on this unscientific sample, one target audience seems to love it…
Recent Bluessky Posts- Allow me to predict there's no chance this will happen: "provisional reopening of the Strait of Hormuz—contingent on ... the release of billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets, and a plan to compensate Iran for damages incurred". So, more war? www.dropsitenews.com/p/exclusive-... May 23, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- History is re-written by the losers. May 23, 2026 Jo Wolff
- Whack-a-mole, or what happens when brownshirts have no fear of courts or consequences. Be sure and read more in the post's comments. May 22, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Indeed. bsky.app/profile/mora... May 22, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Democrats say Donald Trump should stop taking bribes, freeing criminals, suppressing clean energy, defunding research, and driving up the cost of living. These Chinese government officials disagree. May 22, 2026 NY Times Pitchbot
I think the ad is very effective. It’s succinct and makes it point well.
I found it somewhat manipulative but I can see how a soccer mom type would love it.
I thought the ball and chain was a bit much. But the issue of long-term national debt needs to be emphasized, and this ad gets that point across well enough.
I think this is a great ad…in many ways, even more effective than Move-on’s winning add (Child’s Play?”)
the ad gives you a few seconds to watch the child before the narration begins…the child’s actions do not change noticeably, so the audience’s attention becomes focussed on the narration. The narrator details the costs of the Iraq war, and you hear that. Then there is cut to the ball and chain….and although the narration continues, what the observer focusses on is the large black object in the foreground. At this point, the effect of the narration is practically subliminal, as the screen returns to the face of the child, this time distraught.
The last shot “Misleader” superimposed over a picture of Bush, is not terribly effective, and to some extent harms the ads effectiveness by emphasizing the politic nature of the ad itself.