Orcinus summarizes recent developments on other briefings to GW Bush besides the infamous smoking memo. Most interesting to me is the stuff at the end, discussing how the administration is abusing the classification procedures. The national interest certainly may be damaged by the release of sensitive information about the content of a briefing. But once the info is out, how is the national (as opposed to political) interest hurt by releasing the names of the recipients of a memo?
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- I have found Matthew Sag on #AI to be always worth reading and this is no exception. (I haven't always agreed, but where is the fun in that?) September 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Oh boy yes. September 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Gift link to NYT article: www.nytimes.com/2026/09/10/a... September 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- If you had told me even 18 months ago that the government would directly censor a broadcast comedian for interviewing an opposition politician, I would have said, "Sure, in Russia." But when you said "No, in the USA," I would have been deeply dubious. We're drowning in the deep end, folks. September 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell IP: Michael W. Carroll, Distinguishing the Historical Roots of Goodwill From Trademark Law’s Origins, JOTWELL (September 10, 2026) (reviewing Barbara Lauriat, Borrowing Goodwill, 67 Boston College L. Rev. 1127 (2026)), ip.jotwell.com/distinguishi.... September 10, 2026 Jotwell
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers