Orcinus summarizes recent developments on other briefings to GW Bush besides the infamous smoking memo. Most interesting to me is the stuff at the end, discussing how the administration is abusing the classification procedures. The national interest certainly may be damaged by the release of sensitive information about the content of a briefing. But once the info is out, how is the national (as opposed to political) interest hurt by releasing the names of the recipients of a memo?
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- OK but what about senility? Is that not an "inability to discharge the office" sufficient to invoke sec 4 of the 25th amendment? www.politico.com/news/magazin... May 8, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Except Costco does not reliably stock many staples. Universities should teach basic courses every term or year. May 8, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Evil www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-i... May 8, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- If you're being owned by Duncan Robinson's defense that suggests either bad play or bad life choices. May 8, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Debug week not-wins: 1. Cannot see drives on RT-BE96U router; seems to be known bug; 2. Synology Hyperbackup interface remains deeply uncooperative; 3. More and more sites blocking my VPN, failing with deceptive messages. May 7, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers