It seems heretical to even suggest it, but could it be that 9/11 was preventable?
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- OK but what about senility? Is that not an "inability to discharge the office" sufficient to invoke sec 4 of the 25th amendment? www.politico.com/news/magazin... May 8, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Except Costco does not reliably stock many staples. Universities should teach basic courses every term or year. May 8, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Evil www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-i... May 8, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- If you're being owned by Duncan Robinson's defense that suggests either bad play or bad life choices. May 8, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Debug week not-wins: 1. Cannot see drives on RT-BE96U router; seems to be known bug; 2. Synology Hyperbackup interface remains deeply uncooperative; 3. More and more sites blocking my VPN, failing with deceptive messages. May 7, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
Of course 9/11 was preventable, all we needed to do was a little luck and win the lottery, the problem was that the Bush administration did not bother to buy a ticket.
We can argue over what the odds of stopping the plot were, they may have been as low as 10% or as high as 90%, the fact is we will never know because nobody seriously tried.