It seems heretical to even suggest it, but could it be that 9/11 was preventable?
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- When King Charles is not 'white Briton' enough for you. www.theguardian.com/politics/202... Although, strictly speaking, given all the Germans not to mention a Greek, in his family tree Charles does look a bit dodgy from a nativist point of view. August 6, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- via @deadder.bsky.social August 6, 2026 SFDB
- That first one is dated 3/5. So six months old. Seems she recently joined an advisory board for a minerals company. Can you do that as a stide gig, or did she leave her government "job"? financialpost.com/commodities/... August 6, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- @michaelianblack.bsky.social August 6, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- open.spotify.com/track/4VqDn9... August 6, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 52 other subscribers
Of course 9/11 was preventable, all we needed to do was a little luck and win the lottery, the problem was that the Bush administration did not bother to buy a ticket.
We can argue over what the odds of stopping the plot were, they may have been as low as 10% or as high as 90%, the fact is we will never know because nobody seriously tried.