Cute Beats Smart is an excellent curative to this horror.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- Political scientist here: this is not funny, democracies only do this when they're in extreme distress July 1, 2026 Robert (Bob) Kubinec
- So much suffering to warm Stephen Miller's heart. If that can even be done. If there even is one. June 30, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Judge de la O is one of the best local judges. The idea he should be impeached would be certifiable if not so transparently partisan a maneuver to frighten judges and whip up the base. It's hardly news that AG Uthmeier like Gov DeSantis cares not for the rule of law but this is true bottom-feeding. June 30, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Eh? Didn't five (if only five) Justices say birthright citizenship is mandated by the Constitution; only one other one said it turned on legislation. So forget the Byrd Rule: Congress cannot constitutionally undermine it. June 30, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Justice Thomas here giving Justice McReynolds serious competition for most narrow-minded bigoted Justice in history. Which if you think about it is deeply ironic. June 30, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
- Emily Brown on Introduction
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
Not for those of us who are smart but not cute it doesn’t. I’d want, at least, buzzsaws and laser beams on my robot.
Oh please, professor. It’s obvious that the little, innocent-looking robot is using its cuteness to manipulate others into doing the work for it – and then, of course, it gets the credit at the end, not the 20-30 faceless people it duped into doing its navigation for it. It fooled everyone and came out on top.
Shoot, it probably WROTE the 48 laws!
Ha great comments all. I vote for at least one buzzsaw, just on principle. But buzzsaws tend to work against the cuteness factor…
Niccolo Machiavelli had better and more useful advice in the Prince than can be found in the 48 laws.
I got bored reading them (and I’m an avid reader with a pretty good attention-span); it seems like a lot of mental effort to be a scheming, lying, manipulating parasite. And there’s no guarantee that other people will be as dumb as you need them to be in order for the 48 laws to work for you.
Axelrod’s Evolution of Co-operation has a simpler strategy: Co-operate with others as your default strategy, retaliate against those who take advantage of your co-operation.
My own (derivative) theory is that there are two primary types of interaction possible, and two derivative types: The primary two are co-operating and competing, and the derivative two are competing-under the guise of co-operating and co-operating under the guise of competing. both derivative types of interactions can also be referred to as cheating. Cheating is almost impossible to avoid when trying to satisfy the needs of multiple parties, but the best strategy for happiness is to minimize the cheating.