Turns out McCain’s approach to foreign policy is rather more bellicose than anyone (other than a hard-core neo-con) imagined in their most horrible dreams.

But there is no excuse for what the McCain campaign is doing on the “putting America first” front. There is no way to balance it, or explain it other than as evidence of a severe character defect on the part of the candidate who allows it to be used. There is a straight up argument to be had in this election: Mcain has a vastly different view from Obama about foreign policy, taxation, health care, government action…you name it. He has lots of experience; it is always shocking to remember that this time four years ago, Barack Obama was still in the Illinois State Legislature. Apparently, though, McCain isn’t confident that conservative policies and personal experience can win, given the ruinous state of the nation after eight years of Bush. So he has made a fateful decision: he has personally impugned Obama’s patriotism and allows his surrogates to continue to do that. By doing so, he has allied himself with those who smeared him, his wife, his daughter Bridget, in 2000. Those tactics won George Bush a primary—and a nomination. But they proved a form of slow-acting spiritual poison, rotting the core of the Bush presidency. We’ll see if the public decides to acquiesce in sleaze in 2008, and what sort of presidency—what sort of country—that will produce.

This is all well and good, but Mac clearly dominated in Rick Warren's forum tonight.
Best things for Obama to do to improve:
1. Be quicker off the block. Obama pauses and seems to think before he answers. Mac could hardly even wait until Warren was finished asking the question. Who do you think Middle America would want as Commander in Chief? Thinking is like pissing - it must be done, but please, not in public.
2. Stop it with the "uh, um" etc. See above.
3. Sit up straight. Obama has this habit of cocking his head when he's talking to someone, which makes his body language seem closed. Sit up, confront, engage. Dominate. You're not talking to a student in office hours, you're running for biggest pr*ck in the world.
4. Tell a story. Mac has all these gripping stories about being a POW. There's no way Obama can compete with that, but he doesn't necessarily have to. Stories make people connect with you in a very visceral way, but it's the form of the narrative itself, and not the fact that they now know an additional biographical detail about the storyteller, that does the trick. A story is a shared experience, independent of the event or theme depicted, and shared experience is the most reliable method of building trust. Think about it - last time you heard someone telling a really compelling story, did you come away with the impression of a lying bastard? And come on, Obama wrote books! He must have some good stories about community organizing in Chicago, or something.
People agree with a lot of Obama's politics, and I think would agree with him even more if he was more dominant about them. Here's the problem: people will vote for the person who will lead them. McCain may shift, change, equivocate, and lie with the best of them, but he never looks like he has to think about it, or like he doesn't believe 100% of what he's saying. Obama should learn from that, and learn to be blunt and knee-jerk once in a while. He can save the thinking for later. It's like any dysfunctional relationship - the screwed up person making unreasonable demands always gets their way.
The simplest way to put it is: right now, Obama's captain of the chess team, Mac's a dude with a leather jacket and a motorcycle, and America's a teenage girl.
Posted by: AndrewD at August 16, 2008 11:24 PMAndrew proves the point that obama's supporters see in him whatever they want. Andrew's post is full of analysis so naturally he concludes that obama is a chess master. He must have "good stories about community organizing".
Obama has demonstrated no tangible brilliance at any point in his career, nor has anything of substance been found regarding his "community organizing". If by chessmaster you mean political chessmaster, then fine, he beat the clinton machine, good for him. But what did he accomplish in the senate? Nothing. What did he accomplish prior to office? Nothing. Chessmaster? More like hustler.
Sure, he slithered away from his comments about his pastor and his wife's afro-leninism, he can play the game. But again, what has he ever done for you or me?
Ok, he gives you hope. Good for you. Vote for a demagogue you see as a "chessmaster". See how that's working out for russia under Putin.
McCain is equally as worthless. Ask yourself how it could be in your mind that one is so great and the other so bad. That's not very likely, now is it?
In short, the emperor has no clothes.
Seems to me that winning the Democratic nomination over the well-financed and seemingly inevitable Clinton juggernaut is a fairly impressive achievement, no?
Posted by: Michael at August 20, 2008 01:55 PMWell said "name". Couldn't agree any more.
Posted by: carl at August 21, 2008 04:48 AM Imagine a Graph, with Demeaning on One Axis, Stupid on the Other... - Aug 12, 2008
Friday McBush Bashing - Aug 08, 2008
His Lips Are Moving - Aug 06, 2008