Correction: Situation at VA is Even Worse Than Normal

I rarely link to audio, but this morning's NPR segment on the VA is worth a listen just to hear VA Secretary Jim Nicholson do a champion demonstration of what Wallace (of Wallace & Gromit) calls prevaricating around the bush.

The Senate is voting today on a $1.5 billion extra appropriation for VA health care. The VA based its inadequate request in the current budget on the amount it needed in 2002, i.e. planning for medical care as if there were not a war in Iraq. Similarly, when the administration asked for a supplemental appropriation for Iraq — having left it out of the budget to be able to claim the deficit was smaller than everyone knew it actually was — Democratic Senator Patty Murry proposed adding more money for the VA. The administration said it wasn't needed.

In the NPR clip, a Republican senator asks Secretary Nicholson why the VA couldn't see this medical funding budget gap coming. Nicholson, in a truly idiotic move, said his department didn't get caught by surprise — they've known about it since April — but just didn't tell Congress!!!

Yesterday Sen. Murray asked Nicholson if, having said there was no problem when she proposed the extra money for the supplemental appropriation [and, I might add, having repeated that lie two months ago], Nicholson is willing to say that we have a problem now. All he'd say is “we have a situation”. It's worth hearing.

I suspect this is worse than incompetence: This shortfall may not be unexpected at all. I wouldn't be surprised if it were intentional. By not appropriating money in the regular or even the supplemental Iraq appropriation, the administration avoided having to admit they expected any casualties in Iraq — much less estimating how many there might be. (It also kept down the bottom line number in the supplemental.) And, in the classic Washington Monument Ploy, they could rest easy in knowledge that Congress would surely pony up the money when asked.

I hope that every veterans group in the nation gets to hear about this.

UPDATE: The Post says the VA is actually short $2.6 billion for medical care

Earlier VA scandal item: Back to Normal at the VA

This entry was posted in Politics: The Party of Sleaze. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Correction: Situation at VA is Even Worse Than Normal

  1. Mike says:

    Great post. Yes, this certainly is outragous. It seems like political manipulation to me, but it also seems like a situation where Senators can’t say no, and then be accused of turning their backs on veterans. And as mad as we are about the politics, the real people to whom we can’t say no are the young men and women returning home with burns, missing limbs, blindness, brain damage, and other such injuries that seem so common in this war.

  2. Pingback: SIVACRACY.NET: Opinions, Rants, and Obsessions of Siva Vaidhyanathan and his Friends and Family

  3. BobbyV says:

    This is the same tactic used to get us into Iraq. Lie, distort, or misrepresent the facts until we have troops on the ground and mounting causalities. Then force us to stay the course by framing the loss of young American lives as a selfish decision to cut and run when the going gets tough. Rather than deal with the tough issues like providing adequate funding for the VA, our leaders in Washington jockey for attention by sponsoring meaningless bills dealing with flag desecration or the display of religious icons. As much as I hate to acknowledge it, a large number of Red State Americans must feel it more important that the 10 commandments be displayed in our courts then our brave men and women receive adequate medical care. Please add my voice to the growing chorus of modern day patriots working for a better tomorrow both at home and in the world at large. Think peace – support life.

  4. carla says:

    The Bush Administration is rife with incompetence. But what’s so disconcerting is that Democrats have been unable to demonstrate to the American people the depth and breadth of that incompetence..and replace Republicans.

    —–

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.