washingtonpost.com: Leaks Probe Is Gathering Momentum. The good news is that the professional prosecutors are getting heavily involved in the Plame Affair. The bad news is that Ashcroft isn't recusing himself. It sounds as if there is enough momentum here that if the professionals decided to prosecute there's no way Ashcroft could stop them. Worst case, he warns folks in the admnistration about what's coming down, most likely allowing damage control operations. (Very worst case, he sabotages the prosecutors by spilling beans, but I think that Justice has done all the obstruction it can get away with already, by giving the administration 24 hours to shred stuff before moving in to seal records.)
-
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
-
Mostly Cloudy
73°F
-
Sun

81/70
-
Mon

81/70
-
Tue

79/70
-
Mostly Cloudy
73°F
-
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.
Unique Homepage Views:
Sitemeter count:
Feed 1
Feed 2
Recent Comments
- Brautigan: Life Aquatic is definitely a bit weird, like all of Anderson’s work. But if you appreciate watching...
- Just me: Wes Anderson movies are excellent, but yes a little weird. Life Aquatic may be the second worst of his...
- Michael: I am reminded of the famous quote attributed to Zhou Enlai by Henry Kissinger: Upon being asked by Kissinger...
- Vic: As Mr. Gorelick has noted, this entire things rests upon the data actually used (which the slides don’t...
- Michael Froomkin: No love for Caddyshack. None. And I had never even heard of The Life Aquatic before. Looks a bit...

Pingback: Mark A. R. Kleiman
I agree. I wrote almost three months ago that the career prosecutors at DoJ were really our best hope for justice on this.
After all, remember who would appoint a special prosecutor, if there was to be one. In fact, as I implied in the post linked above, if the career prosecutors look to have the goods on someone like Rove, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Ashcroft use the naming of a “loyal” special prosecutor to take the investigation out of their hands.
—–