Category Archives: National Security

War Profiteering (Halliburton Dept.): Following An Ancient if Not Honorable Tradition

You might think that amidst all this 'we support our troops' rhetoric emanating from secure locations in Washington D.C. that someone in the white house or the Pentagon would be making sure that our troops get fed decent food.

Nope. Think again. According to Heather Yarbrough, what we've got is a system in which someone whose job is monitoring the quality and safety of food served to soldiers on U.S. military bases in Iraq gets fired for doing her job.

Talk about history repeating itself. President Abraham Lincoln secured passage of the False Claims Act in 1863 in order to combat similar frauds against the Union Army, including the sale of rancid food for the troops.

Did Heather Yarbrough run afoul of a rush for profits, a system which depends on paying third-world workers pittances and of course no benefits, and gets third-world sanitation practices in return? Or did she just rile an old boy network? Either way, if her charges regarding the way soldiers' food is stored and prepared are correct, it's a scandal.

Freezers and refrigerators weren't working. Food was spoiling. The kitchen workers were exhausted, and some of them weren't following basic sanitation practices. “It became apparent to me that much of the food served at the banquet the night before was … possibly dangerous,” she wrote.

At 2 a.m. Yarbrough saw a lone kitchen worker spreading mayonnaise onto several thousand slices of bread for the next day's sandwiches. He was halfway through the job, and the mayonnaise had sat in open bowls for hours.

The kitchen's air conditioner had moderated the desert heat somewhat, but it had also spewed dust over the worker, the mayonnaise and the bread. Yarbrough conferred with a kitchen supervisor, and they agreed that the mayonnaise and partially made sandwiches should be thrown away.

Yarbrough logged the incident in the journal that she kept for her Halliburton KBR supervisor, and the next day the supervisor applauded her decision to discard the suspect food.

On her second night on duty, Yarbrough met with kitchen staff — all third-country nationals working for ESS — and wrote down a list of supplies needed for sanitary purposes: thermometers to check the heat in steam trays, test strips to measure chlorine in sanitizing water, rubber gloves and other items.

She noted that the day shift had left the dining facility a mess: dirty tables, overflowing trash, no sodas stocked. And she took some feedback from a sergeant who represented Halliburton's client, the Army. “The cream[ed] beef was greasy. Dessert table is messy with crumbs. Stock juices earlier in the morning because they want the products to be cold,” she wrote in her journal.

Over the next few days, Yarbrough trained kitchen workers in sanitation methods and taught seminars on botulism, E. coli and other dangerous bacteria. The kitchen crews seemed to be paying more attention to safety. “Overall, this is much better,” she wrote Aug. 10 in her journal.

The next day, Yarbrough recorded another confrontation with Ray, but she went on with her job. “I gave a short brief on salmonella, likely sources, mode of contamination, toxicity and symptoms of infection,” she wrote. “Cooks seem pleased with this nightly entertainment.”

She planned to give the same talk to day cooks, but she was suspended the next day, relieved of duty and told to pack up and be ready to take the next convoy back to Kuwait.

Yarbrough's supervisor told her she was being fired for wearing a dirty shirt, leaving work early once and other infractions. But Yarbrough felt certain these were bogus charges. The supervisor seemed “eaten up with guilt,” she recalled in an interview. “He wouldn't look me in the eye.”

While waiting for the convoy, Yarbrough appealed to a Halliburton district manager. She told him Ray was compromising food safety, and she believed he'd used his influence to get her fired.

“He told me that I was a danger to myself if I remained at Tikrit,” said Yarbrough. “He wouldn't tell me why, but I thought it was that somebody would have been sent to do me harm.”

Continue reading

Posted in National Security | 1 Comment

How the FBI Treats Whistleblowers? Very Badly

Gail Sheehy (presumably the Gail Sheehy, author of Passages and many other books that don't inspire faith in her reportorial skills….) writes a confusing but disturbing article in the New York Observer (the right-wingish newspaper trying to be an alternative to the far-from-left New York Times-)[As noted by the astute Patrick Nielsen Hayden, I confused the iconoclastic Observer with the bombastic NY Sun; at least that explains why Gail Sheehy would be writing for it!]

In Whistleblower Coming In Cold From the F.B.I. Ms. Sheehy tries to tell four stories in small space:

(1) the “Penttbom” moms who prodded the government into having a panel look into 9/11 failures, only to have the investigation deftly thrown into bureaucratic quicksand by Republicans who saw no profit in a report that might make the nation safer at their political expense.

(2) The story of Sibel Edmonds, a former FBI translator turned whistleblower and allegedly target for crude FBI harassment. [More on this below.]

(3) The substantive story alleged by Ms. Edmunds about an FBI translation department careless about security and penetrated by some people who, like Robert Hanssen before them, were not real subtle about what they were doing.

(4) The aftermath: While Senator Grassley champions her cause, Senator Hatch is the obstacle to further Senate hearings. Meanwhile Ms. Edmonds's lawsuit has run into the government's assertion of state secrets privilege.

If nothing else, the article has certainly whetted my appetite for more information. And I'd like to know whether Senator Hatch cares enough about national security to convene a followup hearing, if he thinks there's nothing to be worried about, or if another Republican will play politics with national security.

Continue reading

Posted in National Security | 3 Comments