My brother's White House Watch column today, entitled Party of the Damned, is particularly mordant.
(revised for clarity)
My brother's White House Watch column today, entitled Party of the Damned, is particularly mordant.
(revised for clarity)
This seems to be promote-Dan-day or something, but be sure to see the great questions at
Rating Bush, on a scale of 1 to 10:
Republican candidates avoid talking about President Bush, for obvious reasons. But journalists should press them to say what they think of Bush's legacy, which elements of his presidency they would emulate, and which they would reject.
And then he has a little list…
Historians looking back on the Bush presidency may well wonder if Congress actually existed.
Exactly.
And the FISA vote is coming up in the next couple of days.
Despite what Atrios seems to think we are Ashkenazi, not Sephardic.
My brother the famous columnist takes questions every so often over at washingtonpost.com. I think these are often even more fun then the columns — maybe he should do radio?
I especially liked this Q&A from yesterday:
Springfield, Va.: If called upon to say something positive about the president, what would you say?
Dan Froomkin: He is in really, really great shape.