Author Archives: Michael Froomkin

I Need to Get More Cynical

When my spouse suggested a similar theory over breakfast the other day — noting the odd coincidence between the Lamont victory and the news that Terrorism Is Back — I was skeptical, noting that the investigation had, after all, been going on for a year.

I have got to get more cynical in time for the next election.

Source: U.S., U.K. at odds over timing of arrests. NBC News has learned that U.S. and British authorities had a significant disagreement over when to move in on the suspects in the alleged plot to bring down trans-Atlantic airliners bound for the United States.

A senior British official knowledgeable about the case said British police were planning to continue to run surveillance for at least another week to try to obtain more evidence, while American officials pressured them to arrest the suspects sooner. The official spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the case.

In contrast to previous reports, the official suggested an attack was not imminent, saying the suspects had not yet purchased any airline tickets. In fact, some did not even have passports.

… At the White House, a top aide to President Bush denied the account. … Another U.S. official, however, acknowledges there was disagreement over timing.

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath | 4 Comments

Failing our Neighbors in St. Bernard Parish

The National Journal’s Jonathan Rauch has some compelling reporting about what’s doing in St. Bernard Parish, right next door to New Orleans — and the answer in Struggling To Survive is “not nearly enough”.

After that has thoroughly depressed you, visit the sidebar in which Jon argues that the root problem is largely bureaucratic:

Is St. Bernard Parish’s bureaucracy fatigue incurable, treatable with smarter bureaucracy, or susceptible only to fundamental reform? The answer is yes — partially — to all of the above.

So is this the administration’s fault? I’d say even if Jon is right that the statutory climate is unhelpful, there’s a lot more that could be done if the line officials were more empowered to get results — and felt that they would get in more trouble for doing nothing than for doing th wrong thing. And that would come only if they got the right sort of direction from the top.

But who remembers New Orleans nowadays?

Posted in Unspeakably Awful (Katrina) | Comments Off on Failing our Neighbors in St. Bernard Parish

This is Beautiful

slacktivist: How I learned that song.

Posted in Blogs | Comments Off on This is Beautiful

Sticker Shock

Via Saffo: journal:

The TSA screeners at SFO (San Francisco International Airport) are handing out these stickers to deserving young travelers.

Got to start them young

Personally, I’m reminded of this poster:

1984

(See also DC Metro poster post and Students for an Orwellian society.)

Posted in Civil Liberties | 3 Comments

Broward Cops Laugh About Shooting Rubber Bullets at Innocent Protestors

I’ve written before about the ugly “Miami Model” of suppressing protesters, free speech and civil rights in general all in the name of making the city safe for the FTAA negotiators. (See Notes From FTAA Fontlines (Nov. 20, 2003); Miami’s FTAA Aftermath: Happy Officials, Allegations of “Police State” Tactics (Dec. 04, 2003); More on Miami FTAA Protests (Dec. 23, 2003).)

Well, it seems it was even uglier than we suspected. The post-FTAA investigation of the police’s tactics didn’t just whitewash police who fired on innocent civilians, but actually praised them. In a training video. While laughing. Cut to yesterday’s Herald, Attorney incensed after viewing FTAA police video:

As a middle-aged Coral Gables attorney, dressed sharply in a red suit jacket, skirt and black slingback heels, Elizabeth Ritter stood out among the throng of protesters on Nov. 20, 2003.

Frustrated that she couldn’t do business because the Miami-Dade County Courthouse was shut down that week during the Free Trade Area of the Americas summit, she hastily made a sign that read ”Fear Totalitarianism” and decided to stand with the protesters.

The sign, however, became her shield against a barrage of rubber bullets fired at her by a legion of Broward Sheriff’s deputies in riot gear. And, in an image captured by a videographer, she is shot in the head as she cowers in the street.

And now another video, recently released, raises questions about the degree to which police, specifically, Broward Sheriff’s deputies, were encouraged, — and even praised — for using force against Ritter and other protesters.

The tape, recorded for training purposes, shows Major John Brooks — then a captain — addressing dozens of deputies in an outdoor BSO tent.

”How about yesterday, huh?” Brooks says, complimenting the officers for their work during the protests. “I would go to war with everyone here.”

Brooks continues, “I went home, I couldn’t sleep, I was just so pumped up about how good you guys were . . . Nobody broke ranks. You’re the best I’ve ever been with.”

Sgt. Michael Kallman, a BSO counterterrorism unit officer, addresses the group next. A voice off-camera says, “What about the lady behind the sign? We have intel on her?”

The officers laugh.

Kallman smiles and says, “The good news about being able to watch you guys live on TV is that the lady with the red dress, I don’t know who got her, but it went right through the sign and hit her smack dab in the middle of the head!”

He raises his forefinger and zooms it toward his forehead.

The cops all laugh.

Another officer asks, off-camera, “Did I get a piece of her red dress?”

BSO’S RESPONSE

No disciplinary action has been taken against any officers in the video, said BSO spokesman Elliott Cohen.

Having been rumbled in public, the chief cop caught red-handed…or red-mouthed…is of course suddenly contrite. But that’s a bit late — having put the verbal equivalent of a smoking gun on video, they’re going to be sued.

Continue reading

Posted in Civil Liberties, Miami | 7 Comments

Quarterman on Fighting Terrorism

John S. Quarterman has a typically intelligent essay, Perilocity: What can We Do about Terrorism?,

Well, for one thing, [we] can continue to discourage use of methods that have little promise of working, such as blanket scans of all telephone numbers or electronic mail, which just increase the haystack without making finding the needle more likely, or national ID cards such as the British government has been pushing lately.

As to what could [we] encourage, how about more Arabic and Farsi-speaking intelligence people, more intelligence and law enforcement agents who understand the cultures that are producing the terrorists and what their grievances are; maybe even agents who can infiltrate them.

And there’s more…

[Bonus update: TSA Insanity by George RR Martin (via Making Light)]

Posted in 9/11 & Aftermath | 1 Comment