Join me today, in person or virtually, at the MIT Public Forums on the REAL ID Act of 2005.
Recent Bluessky Posts- Cell phones got invented well into my adulthood. I have cell phones in my dreams sometimes, but they never work or I can never dial them properly, because if they did or if I could that would solve the problem the dream is about. December 25, 2025 Michael Froomkin
- Sounds like this would help with grading? December 25, 2025 Michael Froomkin
- One of the most amazing and affirming things I've ever read online. There is hope for us all. December 25, 2025 Michael Froomkin
- Today, 1.25 million kids will spend the holiday without their parent because of mass incarceration. December 25, 2025 Prison Policy Initiative
- It's a Christmas Eve news dump. In normal circumstances, probably about the best time of the year to get the least attention. But it won't work here. December 24, 2025 Michael Froomkin
Why don’t they just go the whole hog and pass an act banning ‘evil’?
The premise of the government speakers is that because the act has been passed and takes effect May 2008 (an election year!) that it is inevitable. They don’t seem to be taking much notice of the limited sanctions available to force states into compliance. The only sanction available is to refuse to accept IDs from dissenting states, a sanction that is so excessive as to be absurd.
The political context in which implementation is expected to take place is one where there is intense and sustained protest about the use of torture and imprisonment without trial by US authorities. A very significant proportion, approaching a majority of the country believes that the administration is guilty of war crimes.
Don’t states rights include the right to protect the individual from tyranny?
The actual substance of the act or regulations under the act are irrelevant. Implementation of the act requires trust and that does not exist.