The EU Court of Justice has upheld the validity of the Data Retention Directive (“Directive 2006/24/EC Retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of electronic communications services”) in Ireland v Parliament , decided Feb. 10, 2008.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- jotwell.com ? April 3, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Why is this a win? Dems gave up all their leverage since ICE has BBB funding. What now might spur any reforms? April 2, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Did Putin call yesterday and complain that oil prices were going down? April 2, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Please explain, preferably in small words, why Democrats win by surrendering their leverage over DHS? Bill that House is inexplicably choking on funds everything not able to use BBB$, so remaining issue is just psychological, right? TSA pain gave at least a theoretical path to ICE reform, now what? April 2, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell IP: Laura Pedraza-Fariña, Dynamic Inventorship, JOTWELL (April 2, 2026) (reviewing Amy Motomura, The Inventorship Fallacy, 58 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 2379 (2025)), ip.jotwell.com/dynamic-inve.... April 2, 2026 Jotwell
Recent Comments
- KK Ho on Introduction
- Michael on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Mulalira Faisal Umar on Robot Law II is Now Available! (In Hardback)
- Michael on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
- Just me on Vince Lago Campaign Has No Shame
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 51 other subscribers
Paragraph 3 of the judgement cites a clause in Directive 95/46 including the phrase: “… processing operations concerning […] State security (including the economic well-being of the State when the processing operation relates to State security matters).”
Any offers to explain the scope of the qualification to “economic well-being”?