December 28, 2007

100% Leverage?

Does this mean what I think it does?

Credit Crisis? Just Wait for a Replay: One of the more remarkable facts about the subprime crisis is that total losses to the financial system may be about equal to the amount of subprime loans that were issued. On the face of it, that appears absurd, since many such loans will be paid off, and those that default will not be total losses. But, Mr. Seides said in an interview, “the financial leverage placed on the underlying assets was so high” that the losses multiplied, as the profits did when times were good.

“When there is more leverage” and things go wrong, he said, “there are more losses.”

They resold layered participations in the same underlying loan so many times that it ends up with leverage over 100%? Given that substantial profits are taken out along the way, how does that work even if everyone pays off like they are supposed to?

Update: Krugman is puzzled too.


Posted by Michael : December 28, 2007 10:30 AM | Economics & Money: The Mortgage Mess | TechnoLinks
Slashdot   Slashdot It!
Comments

It works like in the Producers. Perhaps these loans were meant to fail.

Posted by: James Grimmelmann at December 28, 2007 10:50 AM

Hi James, want to buy into our new production, Prisoners of Love?

Posted by: Adam at December 28, 2007 08:43 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?




Comments must be previewed once before posting (this discourages automated posting).


Did you happen to see these?
That Didn't Take Long (Failed Treasury Plan Dept.) - Dec 21, 2007
Calculated Risk on the Paulson-Brokered Voluntary 'Freeze' on (Some) ARMs - Dec 08, 2007
Catching Up With the Florida Funds Scandal - Dec 08, 2007


Add Discourse.net to your RSS/RDF/XML reader: Full feed

Powered by Movable Type 2.64.


   out of