Join me today, in person or virtually, at the MIT Public Forums on the REAL ID Act of 2005.
Recent Bluessky Posts- This one is very cheerful too, although I've been in remission long enough to realistically hope to never need it. Certainly sounds better than what I went through to get here. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/202... June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Life-changing spray may combat my partial immunocompromise: universal respiratory vaccine may be available in 5-7 years. Likely early pandemic countermeasure...could protect against influenza, common cold viruses, RSV, and other respiratory threats. I want this. loriacarrinc.com/news/vaccine... June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Crime against humanity. Murder. Evil. There better be trials soon after the restoration/revolution/reformation/2nd reconstruction whatever we call it. June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Phillips Obrien says recent events show that the US military is in dire shape and the Iran war is so irretrievably lost that Trump is resorting to bribing Iran to reduce attacks. Hegseth + strategic idiocy + firing competent officers + graft = disaster. phillipspobrien.substack.com/p/midweek-up... June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- John Marshall doesn't get above the fold? June 10, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Why don’t they just go the whole hog and pass an act banning ‘evil’?
The premise of the government speakers is that because the act has been passed and takes effect May 2008 (an election year!) that it is inevitable. They don’t seem to be taking much notice of the limited sanctions available to force states into compliance. The only sanction available is to refuse to accept IDs from dissenting states, a sanction that is so excessive as to be absurd.
The political context in which implementation is expected to take place is one where there is intense and sustained protest about the use of torture and imprisonment without trial by US authorities. A very significant proportion, approaching a majority of the country believes that the administration is guilty of war crimes.
Don’t states rights include the right to protect the individual from tyranny?
The actual substance of the act or regulations under the act are irrelevant. Implementation of the act requires trust and that does not exist.