In More Evidence That Judges Have Had it With Banks, Yves Smith points to Phillips v US Bank, N.a., Sup Ct Carroll Cty Ga.20111102, which (assuming it is real), can only be called a epic dismissal of a complaint.
Recent Bluessky Posts- We have an apparent cure for most people with pancreatic cancer—a profoundly swift, deadly cancer—and the position of the U.S. government is that it should be banned. This is real fall-of-empire stuff. April 19, 2026 Waldo Jaquith
- Further evidence that "Yes Minister" remains one of the best works of political science relating to the UK government, and probably all democratic governments. www.theguardian.com/politics/202... April 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- People are saying that if Trump's "Trumphial Arch" actually gets built then Democrats should plan to demolish it as soon as they can. I'm not sure I agree: rather than spend the money we should just rename it as the Monument to Stupidity. www.nytimes.com/2026/04/15/u... April 17, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Jotwell Worklaw: Michael Z. Green, Drilling Down on Anti-DEI Case Results, JOTWELL (April 17, 2026) (reviewing Michael Selmi, DEI and the Private Workplace, available at SSRN (September 11, 2025)), worklaw.jotwell.com/drilling-dow.... April 17, 2026 Jotwell
- Ugh. And I really liked the guy. April 17, 2026 Michael Froomkin
I was struck by the complete lack of legal citations in the order. That makes me skeptical that the order is real.
The lack of legal citation in an order is nothing new in state court practice. What stuck me as unusual is that the Judge would have written an order at all. If state court practice in Georgia is anything like it is here, the motion would have been heard in open court, the judge would have issued a verbal tongue lashing, the parties would have walked outside and hand-written a vanilla order with no findings of fact or legal citation, and the judge would have signed it without reading it.
As for a bank denying modification, I have handled a hand full of foreclosure cases on the defense side, and have spoken to lawyers who handle dozens (if not hundreds) of these cases. The consensus seems to be that there are two standard answers when the defendant asks for a modification: 1) “No because you make too much money and never should have fallen behind,” and 2) “No because you don’t make enough money and you can’t afford any reasonable modification.”