In More Evidence That Judges Have Had it With Banks, Yves Smith points to Phillips v US Bank, N.a., Sup Ct Carroll Cty Ga.20111102, which (assuming it is real), can only be called a epic dismissal of a complaint.
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
All opinions on this blog are those of the author(s) and not their employer(s) unelss otherwise specified.
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in.Reader Map
Recent Bluessky Posts- @miamilawschool.bsky.social admitted its best-credentialed and most selective 1L class ever. The MiamiLaw admit rate is vastly lower than when I started here, and the LSATs much higher. (Hard to evaluate higher GPAs in light of grade inflation.) Doing something right news.miami.edu/law/stories/... August 19, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Amazed it wasn't yesterday too. August 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- I think that was the Moderns, right? (As opposed to the Ancients, or the Middle-English....) August 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- I'm guessing this isn't aimed at law school faculty? It seems to assume undergraduate teaching.... August 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
- Still on 6. Nervously eyeing the coming end of security patches in October. August 18, 2026 Michael Froomkin
Recent Comments
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Join 53 other subscribers
I was struck by the complete lack of legal citations in the order. That makes me skeptical that the order is real.
The lack of legal citation in an order is nothing new in state court practice. What stuck me as unusual is that the Judge would have written an order at all. If state court practice in Georgia is anything like it is here, the motion would have been heard in open court, the judge would have issued a verbal tongue lashing, the parties would have walked outside and hand-written a vanilla order with no findings of fact or legal citation, and the judge would have signed it without reading it.
As for a bank denying modification, I have handled a hand full of foreclosure cases on the defense side, and have spoken to lawyers who handle dozens (if not hundreds) of these cases. The consensus seems to be that there are two standard answers when the defendant asks for a modification: 1) “No because you make too much money and never should have fallen behind,” and 2) “No because you don’t make enough money and you can’t afford any reasonable modification.”