Daily Archives: October 23, 2003

Why The Anti-Spam Law is a Joke

Pro-Spam “Anti-Spam” Law (found via Electrolite).

Nathan Newman has identified one of the key problems with the Senate's much touted anti-spam law, so I don't have to…

Posted in Law: Internet Law | 1 Comment

Patrick Gudridge on the Schiavo Case

The New York Times quotes my colleague Patrick Gudridge's charateristic appraisal of the Florida legislature's hasty action in the Schiavo case. See In Florida Right-to-Die Case, Legislation Puts the Constitution at Issue. I especially like the comment that “It's beautifully badly drafted.”

Posted in Florida | Leave a comment

Even If US Courts Don’t Have Jurisdiction Over Guantanamo, There Is No Recourse to Cuban Courts

In response to my most recent item on Guantánamo Edward Hasbrouck asks this reasonable question: “if courts in the USA say Guantanamo isn't under their jurisdiction, doesn't that mean they would have to recognize Cuban jurisdiction?”

The answer to this question is unusually clear: No.

Continue reading

Posted in Guantanamo, Law: International Law | 5 Comments

I Need User-Friendly Collaborative Drafting Software

The faculty is getting set to produce, G*d help us, a mission statement. The chance that this will be a pointless waste of time is high, much higher than a Retreat. But the downside is also bounded; the odds that anyone will get mad about this seem low. Unfortunately, we can't simply decide not to do it, as the central administration hath sent out a decree unto all parts of the University, yea even unto the most autonomous of Schools, that There Shall Be Mission Statements. And so there shall be.

So I thought I should try to make lemonade from this lemon. Why not use this as an excuse to introduce the faculty to the wonders of collaborative drafting software?

Continue reading

Posted in Software | 2 Comments