Eric Muller is a man of many talents. One of them appears to be bumper sticker design.
Michael Kinsley nails it in Why Bush Angers Liberals. My main puzzlement is, what makes Kinsley think only liberals think like this? Or, if he’s right, why do only liberals think like this?
If you have no interest in learning better Linux or Perl, skip this. If you are a Linux or Perl Deity, skip this. If, like me, you want to improve your basic Linux and pidgin Pearl to, say, halting fluency, help is a download away. Get the The Regex Coach - interactive regular expressions. Download it, and rejoice to live in a world in which people just make free useful goodies available for the rest of us.
The Washington Post is suggesting that the passage of Security Council Resolution 1511 is not a major victory for the Bush administration as “a range of analysts said the final vote, while far better than a withdrawal or a resolution approved with numerous abstentions, is too weak to be considered much of a victory.”
Not so fast. At first glance, Resolution 1511 is a very big win for US contractors seeking to profiteer from the Iraqi reconstruction — and those firms will no doubt make their gratitude felt to the Administration in a tangible way.
One serious and under-appreciated problem the Administration has faced in Iraq is that the US-backed puppet provisional governing Council is not recognized as a true government. Never mind the question of legitimacy — it’s not been recognized as a government because among other things, it lacks the authority to govern. All its decisions have to be approved by the local US viceroy.
Lack of recognition has consequences. First, that the US is bound by the Hague and Geneva conventions, and by customary international law, to play the role of the occupying power until there is a government. As such, US is not supposed to make too many permanent economic decisions, especially when it comes to disposing of natural resources such as oil.
Similarly, international bodies such as the IMF, and many foreign aid donors, have also been reluctant to help in Iraq until they had a proper government to deal with.
In that context, three paragraphs of the Security Council’s latest are potentially important. The Security Council
4. Determines that the Governing Council and its ministers are the principal bodies of the Iraqi interim administration, which, without prejudice to its further evolution, embodies the sovereignty of the State of Iraq during the transitional period until an internationally recognized, representative government is established and assumes the responsibilities of the Authority;13. Determines that the provision of security and stability is essential to the successful completion of the political process as outlined in paragraph 7 above and to the ability of the United Nations to contribute effectively to that process and the implementation of resolution 1483 (2003), and authorizes a multinational force under unified command to take all necessary measures to contribute to the maintenance of security and stability in Iraq, including for the purpose of ensuring necessary conditions for the implementation of the timetable and programme as well as to contribute to the security of the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq, the Governing Council of Iraq and other institutions of the Iraqi interim administration, and key humanitarian and economic infrastructure;
20. Appeals to Member States and the international financial institutions to strengthen their efforts to assist the people of Iraq in the reconstruction and development of their economy, and urges those institutions to take immediate steps to provide their full range of loans and other financial assistance to Iraq, working with the Governing Council and appropriate Iraqi ministries.
(bold added; italics in original)
In other words, (to the limited extent it cared) Resolution 1511 may solve the Administration’s legal problem under international law. Thus it’s open season for privatizing and selling off Iraqi assets, and locking down long-term agreements with US firms.
Plus, the IMF and the donors are told that they no longer have their favorite legal excuse to avoid turning on the aid spigot. Not that they may not think of a new one.
It’s official. U.M. President Donna Shalala has unveiled the great fundraising campaign for the University of Miami, code-named Momentum. And the goal is not small—a cool $1 billion by mid-2007, although I think this sum includes donations to things like scholarships as well as gifts to capital.
Actually, like most university capital campaigns, it began before it began, and we now have more than half donated or pledged.
Unfortunately for me, it looks as if the medical school will not just get the lion’s share, but a couple dozen other shares too. The law school’s share in all this is, well, quite small in the grand scheme of things, and less than double what is to be earmarked for ROTC.
A venture capital firm called Baystar Capital was crazy enough to invest $50 million in SCO, the people making what appear to the naked eye to be highly preposterous claims about ‘owning’ unix. (Full details at Groklaw, of course.) If this is a Microsoft-inspired way of keeping a cloud on the legal status of Linux, it’s depressing. If the Baystar people actually are wrong enough to think that SCO has a case, that’s really depressing — think of all the better uses for $50 million! (And if you want better investments in the internet/tech field, call me — I can point you to a really great investment you can make for one twentieth of that amount.)
There is of course a third logical possibility, however unlikely: Baystar have made a smart bet. Very unlikely, and far too depressing to contemplate.