Really Useful and Obscure Computer CPU Info

I'd say this is one of the most useful posts ever for people thinking of buying a PC: How many Intel CPUs will fail the XP Mode test in Windows 7?.

What Ed Bott has done is go through the somewhat obscure Intel info and identify which chips will run XP in virtual mode under Windows 7. There is no method to the Intel madness: more expensive doesn't inevitably mean that your CPU will have the needed virtualization extensions (Intel VT), nor does more cores. You just have to know. And now you can.

By blind dumb luck, the computer I'm writing this on, a Dell Precision T3400 — a sort of stopgap refurbished machine I bought in a hurry when my old one croaked a few months ago — has a E6850 on it, so I'm OK in the unlikely event I upgrade from XT.

That said, my plan if and when I get a RoundTuit, is to test out the really nifty-looking new release of Ubuntu, with a Virtual Box, and see how that box handles Wordperfect. If it's fast and smooth, that's where I'm headed if the guest can share the clipboard with the host.

Clipboard sharing works great with XP as host and Ubuntu as guest. Only complaint is that sharing a directory doesn't work out of the box, and sharing a USB drive runs into hardware issues. (I gather you lose 3D in the guest, but I am not a gamer, so I can live with that.)

This entry was posted in Sufficiently Advanced Technology. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Really Useful and Obscure Computer CPU Info

  1. Rhodo Zeb says:

    Just for kicks, I checked out clipboard sharing on my Ubuntu 8.04 with Sun VB 2.0.6 between the native gedit Ubuntu program and wordpad in XP, and it worked!

    Sorry I don’t have wordperfect, I doubt I could even find a pirated copy here in the PRC. The market is just too small.

    Agreed that directory sharing and accessing the usb system through the virtual box can also be a pain.

  2. In that case, just stick with XP why even upgrade? I can image that running it as a virtual would just suck up more processing power anyway.

    sttn slnd dvrc ttrnys

    [Moderator's note: I have disemvoweled a part of this post, consistent with version 1.3 of the comments policy, which states "I may disemvowel the URL to commercial sites even if a post is arguably on-topic when I believe the poster is engaged in a pattern of linking to different commercial sites under false names, or even to a single site under multiple names or linked terms."]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.