Why I am not the least bit surprised that all three major Florida universities — UM, UF, FSU — are represented on this select list of institutions of higher education who have signed deals with Victoria's Secret for “pink” themed clothes and underwear?
All so very tasteful and revenue-enhancing, I'm sure. And so Florida. Although to be fair, there are lots of schools from both sunny and raininy states on that list…
(Spotted via Kieran Healy, A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.)
Now that the Boston Celtics have won the “world” championship, eyes are firmly set on the Euro soccer championship. The tournament has already moved to the quarter finals. It is hard to understate the impact of this event on life in most of Europe (and many other parts of the world).
Even if you are not interested in the game itself, perhaps you might enjoy my general observations on the meaning of the euro soccer championship:
• Law of supply and demand: International soccer championships are a special occasion. The European championship occurs only every 4 years. The World championship also takes place every four years. This means that there is always one year of “nothingness” in between each tournament. Artificial scarcity of supply => increase in demand.
• Global warming. Streets are empty during most games. Al Gore loves soccer championships (except victories for Turkey, see below).
• Numbers don’t add up:
o Some small countries (Croatia, Holland) perform really well on a consistent basis even though they have a small population. Most likely explanation: something in the faucet water.
o The distortion of money: one of the very richest soccer leagues in the world, England, has the best teams (see Champions league results) but underperforms on the world stage. One explanation: the money allows them to import foreign players, lowering the amount of national players in crucial positions in the league (beware MLS).
• Soccer & Steroptypes: Germany: it is not always pretty, but the outcome is always efficient. Gary Lineker famously described soccer as a game ” for 22 people that run around, play the ball, and one referee who makes a slew of mistakes, and in the end Germany always wins.”. The German soccer team always manages to beat some of the most stylish, talented teams and advance to the final stages. This years seems no different. In the first quarter final Germany beat an immensely talented Portuguese squad (3-2). The bookmakers (who are also very efficient) favor Germany as the final winner (1/4) of the tournament.
I think Obama will be great on foreign policy. On domestic policy, not so much.
Today he as good as sold out the fight against FISA's immunity provisions. While the statement below might sound OK, it's failure to say that the bill is unacceptable in its current form, or to say 'filibuster' amounts to a surrender to the fix put in by the leadership. (And, no, this bill is not in any noticeable way an improvement over its predecessor draft. The judicial review provisions are a sham — they don't test for the legality of any wiretapping, they don't test for the legality of any request by the administration to engage in wiretapping, they don't test for whether the recipients of those requests thought or had reason to think that the requests were legal — no, all the court will test is whether the administration says that it made a request. Big deal.)
As one person put it to me, “Obama's national security state is going to be so much cooler than McCain's.”
The full text of Obama's weasly statement is below.
Update: Jack Balkin says, from Obama's perspective, what's not to like?.
British survey findings on young people's music ownership show that teenagers and students have an average of more than 800 illegally copied songs each on their digital music players.
Here is an excerpt: The research also showed that half of 14 to 24-year-olds were happy to share all the music on their hard drive, enabling others to copy hundreds, or thousands, of songs at any one time. Although illegal copying has become widespread, the scale of the problem uncovered by the University of Hertfordshire left the music industry surprised. On average every iPod or digital music player contained 842 illegally copied songs. Fergal Sharkey, former lead singer of the Undertones and now chief executive of British Music Rights, said: “I was one of those people who went around the back of the bike shed with songs I had taped off the radio the night before. But this totally dwarfs that, and anything we expected.”
I don’t see what there is to be surprised about. Even if the entertainment industry’s scare tactics (lawsuits) have moved file-sharing traffic away from major P2P sites to smaller sites and various torrents, the overall volume of sharing might still be high. Besides, free copynorms among young people are not going away. My own study on the interaction between deterrence and copynorms shows that scare tactics may strengthen pro-copy norms among file-sharers. This new study shows just how much portable storage capacity boosted off line sharing.
The Democratic Congressional leadership has endorsed the new FISA sellout. (Text here; instant analysis by EFF here.)
The ACLU is enraged. See ACLU Blog: Because Freedom Can't Blog Itself: Official Blog of the American Civil Liberties Union » This Spade is a Spade: FISA Deal Is Bunk
You should be enraged too. Perhaps you might even consider a donation to the fund that seeks to punish elected officials who should know better (starting with House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer), the Act Blue PAC vs. Retroactive Immunity, also known as the Strange Bedfellows Fund, as it's attracting support from a group ranging from progressives to supporters of Ron Paul.
Our only hope in stopping this is going to be the Senate. Is Obama going to step out to lead on this? (Meanwhile see the statement by Sen. Feingold.)
I have no idea why our congressional leaders feel a need to be so craven on this issue. Their position doesn't even poll well. It's as if they are suffering from some sort of battered person syndrome or something.
Not surprisingly, McBush's poll numbers are slipping in key battleground states…
- Talking Points Memo, McCain Signs on For More Bush Bamboozlement!
- The Carpetbagger Report, Clark hits McCain — and hits all the right notes
- Kevin Hayden, McCain attacks Supreme Court, Constitution and Founding Fathers
- Crooks & Liars, McCain struggles to wrap up his own party’s support
- Kos, Random voters, McCain-style
- Kos, McCain can't balance his own budget — is he really carrying over $100,000 in credit card debt? Or is it closer to $500,000? Either way, it seems odd…
- Crooks & Liars, McCain sees detainee ruling as one of the ‘worst’ in ‘the history of this country’
- John McCain Debates Himself on Supporting Bush
- Mike Stark, ABC, McCain Cancels Event with Controversial Fundraiser — No, Wait! — it's on again (sort of, but without the controversial host)
- Crooks & Liars, McCain Caught Stealing Democratic Music
- Carpetbagger Report, McCain ‘promises’ to get bin Laden — with ‘people who can swim in the water’
- Firedoglake, McCain Losing “Maverick” Brand; Voters Most Likely To See Him As “Old”
- Kos, McCain's Straight Talk & Support For the Military
- Feminist Law Professors, Information Is Power. In a somewhat related vein, Cooks & Liars, Wesley Clarke on McCain: ‘He’s changed his position on torture. Who is he?’
- Andrew Lebovich at The Washington Note,Guest Post: A Belated Note on McCain, Petraeus, and Civil-Military Relations
- Jeffrey Klein: McCain's Secret, Questionable Record – Politics on The Huffington Post — which I think matters only for the reasons set out in Crooks & Liars, McCain’s secrecy over Navy records raises questions
- McCain's Offshore Drilling Position A Flip From Three Weeks Ago (see the YouTube version of the flip — I've said all along that YouTube would kill McCain's electability…
The Great Grimmelmann writes in The Laboratorium: Copyright, Technology, and Access to the Law that he's
just released Copyright, Technology, and Access to the Law: An Opinionated Primer:
Recently, the state of Oregon has used copyright law to threaten people who were publishing its laws online. Can they really do that? More to the point, why would they? This essay will put the Oregon fracas in historical context, and explain the public policies at stake. Ultimately, it’ll try to convince you that Oregon’s demands, while wrong, aren’t unprecedented. People have been claiming copyright in “the law” for a long time, and at times they’ve been able to make a halfway convincing case for it. While there are good answers to these arguments, they’re not always the first ones that come to hand. It’s really only the arrival of the Internet that genuinely puts the long-standing goal of free and unencumbered access to the law within our grasp.
This isn’t an academic piece. Instead, it’s designed to bring nonlawyers and people outside the open-access-to-law movement up to speed on the basics of the history, the context, the principles, and the law. Along the way, it tells some interesting stories. I hope you’ll find it equal parts informative, entertaining, and inspirational. Please have a look.
A fun read and a public service.