Many law professors dream of having a theory of constitutional interpretation attributed to them. As it happens, that was never quite exactly my dream. But if—as just happened on a mailing list for teachers of constitutional law—someone had been going to credit me with stating 'the universal insight that explains constitutional law' and even promised to “steal it and use it without remorse, giving due credit, of course,” I don't think that I'd choose to be known for blogging the 'squint theory' of interpretation.
-
A Personal Blog
by Michael Froomkin
Laurie Silvers & Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Miami School of Law
My Publications | e-mail
-
Overcast
82°F
-
Thu

84/73
-
Fri

82/75
-
Sat

84/75
-
Overcast
82°F
-
Who Reads Discourse.net?
Readers describe themselves.
Please join in. -
Recent Comments
- John Christy: Thank you!!! What a relief. Why on earth doesn’t Google incorporate this patch?
- Earl Killian: Dan Boneh’s online crypto course is very good for those who want a more in-depth treatment....
- scott huminski: Second Plaintiff Files in United States of America v. Sheriff Arpaio United States of America v....
- Joe1: Does it cost as much as a ringworld with asteroid defenses and fusion motors to spin up the ring?
- Just me: Love it

